Prior to seeing a replica of the 1961 Ferrari GT in a magazine, writer and director John Hughes had initially intended for the car to be a Mercedes. The GT Spyder California replica was created by Modena Design and Development’s Neil Glassmoyer and Mark Goyette.
And the “Ferrari” that crashed through the window and perished? It wasn’t even in motion. A fiberglass shell was specially constructed by Glassmoyer and Goyette with the intention of being demolished for that scenario.
In This Article...
The Ferrari from Ferris Bueller’s Day Off wasn’t as real as you might think.
I’ve never been a big fan of cars. Our family runabout is merely a red object with four wheels and some seats inside; I have no idea what brand it is. Even though I don’t even have a driver’s license, once other males start talking about horsepower and other such topics, I usually find an excuse to break off the conversation. Even so, there are a few movie automobiles that make me salivate despite my usual lack of interest in all things automotive.
A 1970 Dodge Challenger from “Vanishing Point” would be my first choice. Naturally, I wouldn’t turn down a ride in James Bond’s Aston Martin either, even if it was simply to experiment with the ejector seat, missile launchers, and bulletproof screen. As for the stunning Plymouth Fury from “Christine,” I’d be willing to take a chance on her murderous tendencies simply to ride shotgun with her.
Then there is the Ferrari from John Hughes’ iconic 1980s comedy “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off,” which is about a high school misfit who wants to skip class one last time before graduating. A flawless, incredibly rare 1961 Ferrari 250 GT California Spyder serves as the film’s main prop, and we know from the time it appears on screen that it will be destroyed. Like the piano Stan and Ollie are carrying up the flight of stairs in “The Music Box,” it is the comedic counterpart of Chekhov’s gun. A priceless, cherished thing that is introduced in the first act must unquestionably be destroyed by the time the credits appear. One specific query—how—is the source of the tension.
The iconic Ferrari from Ferris Bueller’s Day Off will be auctioned off
A legendary Ferrari from the film Ferris Bueller’s Day Off will soon be auctioned off.
One of three replicas created for the 1986 cult blockbuster starring Matthew Broderick was the 250 GT California Spyder.
When the vintage car goes up for sale this month, there should be a lot of interest.
The drop-top 250 GT California was difficult to locate and costly to employ for the movie, especially when considering the required stunts, as Ferrari only produced just over 100 vehicles.
While three fake Modenas were driven throughout the movie, close-up shots were taken with a real Ferrari.
When Ferris’ friend Cameron Frye tries to erase some miles off one of the cars’ odometers in the comedy, one of the cars is even completely ruined while the other is never finished.
This replica is solely powered by a Ford V8 engine, as opposed to an authentic Ferrari 250 GT, which features a V12 engine.
The 1985 convertible, which has been kept in immaculate condition, may fetch up to PS180,000.
A replica that had undergone a 10-year restoration was previously sold at a Mecum Auction back in 2013 for $235,000 (PS180,000).
Replicas are stopped
There were just 100 of these 1961 Ferrari 250 GT California Spyders produced at a cost of roughly $300,000. Undoubtedly, Hughes didn’t want to spend so much money on a vehicle for the picture, especially one that would be wrecked and ruined. As a result, the “replicars” Glassmoyer and Goyette created were flawless.
They attached authentic Ferrari insignia to them to give them the appearance of the real thing. The only issue was that they didn’t have Ferrari’s consent to do so. Glassmoyer and Goyette were ultimately sued by Ferrari, and they were forced to halt production of their “replicars.”
“High fives all around to Jeff, Andy, and Kristi! They made every effort to come to a BIG decision.”
The Modena GT Spyder California from 1985
It would have been impossible to send an actual Ferrari 250 GT California flying through a second-story window and into a ravine, as they do in the movie, given the exorbitant price tags. According to The Drive, the movie’s producers instead paid Modena Design to construct three duplicates for their movie. Two were entirely constructed, and the third was virtually nothing more than a shell that was used for the scene where the car is wrecked. Actor Matthew Broderick did not know how to drive a car with a manual transmission, so one was even made specifically with an automatic transmission.
What is the value of the Ferrari from Ferris Bueller?
Ferris, the youthful protagonist of the iconic 1980s film Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, suggests purchasing a Ferrari 250 GT California Spyder because “It is so choice”—if you have the money, of course. Bueller was correct on this one point, even though you would not want to rely on the advise of a Ferrari-stealing, joyriding truant for much else. A genuine 250 GT California is a priceless vintage car that is worth millions of dollars. This 1985 Modena Spyder California, better known to the world as one of the three Ferrari replicas used in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, is almost as good as the real deal and sold for a more manageable $396,000 on Saturday at the 2020 Barrett-Jackson Scottsdale auction.
According to popular belief, John Hughes intended for his next film to have a Ferrari 250 GT California Spyder as its lead vehicle. The only issue was that even then, a true Ferrari was too pricey. It’s simple to understand why a duplicate was utilized in place of the original vehicle given the rough treatment it would undergo in the movie, including jumps and being thrown backwards out of a suburban Chicago home and into a ravine.
Hughes came across Modena Design, a business established in 1980s California with the goal of creating reproductions of the legendary vehicle (basically a drop-top 250 GT “Tour de France,” one of which we tested). For the movie, three automobiles in various stages of completion were ordered. Only one of them was brought back to Modena Design, where the car’s movie damage was fixed and it was sold several more times, most recently to an American at a Bonhams auction in England in 2010 for over $100,000. That vehicle is currently on the National Historic Vehicle Registry’s list. But that isn’t the vehicle that sold at Barrett-Jackson.
This is really one of the two chassis that had more enigmatic lives after Ferris Bueller finished filming. This car, chassis 001, has recently undergone a full restoration by Modena Design co-founder Neil Glassmoyer, unlike the third car, chassis 003, which went unsold at Mecum’s 2019 Monterey auction with a high bid of $225,000. The car’s exterior was changed and its mechanical parts were upgraded to bring it to this state. We assume that despite being equipped with a coil-over suspension, chrome 16-inch wire spoke wheels, and a 7.0-liter Chevy V-8 engine, this non-Italian Ferrari is still a lot of fun to drive. Along with the car, other memorabilia was offered for sale, including a signed certificate of authenticity from Modena Design.
At Barrett-Jackson, competitive bidding led to a final price that included the buyer’s premium of $396,000. There is no disputing that chassis 001, a pricey cinematic symbol, will go down in history, even though it is unknown exactly which sequences it appeared in for the movie.
In Ferris Bueller, did they really wreck the car?
The Ferris Bueller’s Day Off cast and crew reportedly detested the Ferrari featured in the movie and rejoiced when it was wrecked, according to actor Alan Ruck. The cast and crew of the 1980s classic Ferris Bueller’s Day Off reportedly detested the Ferrari and celebrated when it was wrecked, according to actor Alan Ruck.
Did Alan Ruck in Ferris Bueller have to pay for the car?
The “Succession” actor visited “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” on Monday, mostly to talk about the popular HBO series. Of course, the 1986 John Hughes comedy was brought up.
One question regarding Ferris Bueller’s Day Off is asked more frequently than any other, and yes, it is about that stunning 1961 Ferrari 250 GT California Spyder.
The Succession star appeared on Jimmy Kimmel Live! on Monday and mainly discussed the popular HBO series. Of course, the 1986 John Hughes comedy was brought up.
Ruck, who is always a good sport about the subject, shared how much he was paid to play Ferris’ best pal Cameron Frye as well as the question Bueller fans pester him about the most.
Ruck told Kimmel, “I made $40,000.” It was my first significant acting role in a film, and they’ll use any justification to avoid paying you.
The most frequent query is: Did you actually wreck that Ferrari? Yes, and it was fantastic, according to Ruck.
“Because they were all bad, everyone may unwind and sigh with relief. All of them were kit automobiles “Ruck clarified. “A genuine Ferrari was beyond our means. It had a fiberglass body on a Mustang chassis. They were truly miserable. They refused to start. Due of the car’s inability to start, we performed this one scenario 16 times. There were three of us. The workers applauded as we threw that one out the window. They were hopping around.”
Where was Ferris Bueller shot?
If practicing social distance while cooped up indoors makes you long for a day out, pull out your copy of Ferris Bueller’s Day Off and take a trip back in time to 1980s Chicago to pass the time. John Hughes wrote a “love letter” to the city in his film. In his own words, “I really wanted to portray as much of Chicago as I could. “Not just in the scenery and architecture, but also in the spirit.”
Not only is Chicago the setting for the adored 1986 movie. The Art Institute, Lake Shore Drive, Willis Tower, and other locations such as these were crucial to the plot and nearly seemed to have lives of their own. And Midwesterners were able to claim a piece of Hollywood for themselves by filming the city’s skyscrapers, historical sites, streets, and inhabitants.
Many of the locations mentioned in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off have personal significance for Hughes as well. For instance, the future filmmaker frequently used the Art Institute’s hallways to escape suburban life when he was a high school student growing up in Northbrook, Illinois.