I mean, this is a very simple question, isn’t it? Mercedes, Ferrari, and Red Bull have consistently ranked at the top of the list of F1 teams in terms of spending since since the V6 era began. The major three are financially stable, and their significant investments have consistently contributed to their successful results.
Mercedes made an investment of about $484 million in 2019, Ferrari made an investment of $463 million, while Red Bull made an investment of $445 million. After the top teams, Renault had annual spending of $272 million in 2020; this puts them quite a distance from the three title-contending teams.
The top three teams will probably continue to rule the grid for the time being despite the implementation of financial limitations. But there is a good likelihood that the remainder of the grid will eventually overtake the leaders.
In This Article...
How Is It Possible For An F1 Team To Spend $450 Million In A Year And Still Be Profitable?
In motorsports, there is an old joke that asks, “How can you make a millionaire racing?” begin with a billion dollars. However, with Formula 1, that could be altering.
There was a time when money wasn’t thought to be made through racing. Asking about the profitability of a racing team or a TV commercial as part of an automaker’s advertising campaign would have made just as much sense. Instead, as the adage goes, automakers were intended to race on Sunday and sell on Monday.
The F1 teams essentially all broke even last year, and some, like Red Bull and Mercedes, even made tiny gains of $10–$20 million, according to general consensus. In light of the fact that teams can spend up to $450 million year on their operations, that is somewhat astonishing.
That’s because teams need a large crew to field competitive cars and attend races, in addition to the fact that the cars and their drivers are pricey and created by some of the world’s top engineers. Beyond that, there is the basic cost of transporting everyone, their equipment, and the entire infrastructure to every event throughout the year. All of it adds up.
Teams earn money in a variety of ways to cover those costs. Some teams receive money from their drivers, some sell other teams equipment like engines, and F1 awards prizes each year. But the true moneymakers are the companies that pay to have their logos on the cars and the racing gear used by the drivers.
This means a lot of airtime for a Mercedes sponsor in addition to being connected with a successful team. An estimated 19% of the entire season last year saw the Mercedes vehicle on the screen. And that is useful.
It’s a bit surprising that Formula 1 teams make any money at all, but $10–$20 million is a tiny margin to be operating with, especially in a sport where there’s not much of a guarantee of success. I’ve always been curious as to why someone like Lawrence Stroll would be interested in purchasing a team, in this case Aston Martin.
But those margins are expected to increase. The money that all teams are making will suddenly look like a great profit now that the teams are being restricted to a cost cap of $145 million, which perhaps explains why the sport appeals to so many investors.
A New Development in the $140 Million Budget Cap Battle That Is Splitting F1 Teams
Teams typically fall into one of two categories: those that took inflation into account and those who did not.
Due to inflation, which has increased energy prices, as well as logistical costs, which are higher due to increased demand and lengthier travel routes as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the larger teams are in support of a boost to the existing $140 million ceiling.
We sat down and agreed those figures, and nobody could have even contemplated world events that are driving inflation. We don’t even know what that inflation is going to be in the second half of the year. Mattia Binotto, the Ferrari team boss, stated that there is “no way for us to stay below” the limit, while Christian Horner, the Red Bull counterpart, stated that “certainly all the major teams are going to breach that $140 million count this year.
Citing the risk to the program and the potential for additional layoffs, they are eager to develop a practical solution for Formula 1. However, some other teams already have that logical answer.
The best course of action, according to Alfa Romeo CEO Frederic Vasseur, is to turn off the wind tunnel and stop bringing updates every single weekend if energy or freight costs go up. We’re in this position, and sooner or later we’ll have to halt the construction of the car since we’ll have spent all of our available funds. I believe everyone can do the same.
Inflation was already at 7% at the time, and the Retail Price Index in England was 7.1% or 7.2%, according to Alpine team principal Otmar Szafnauer. We took that into account when we made our budgets and planned out all the development work that we were going to perform.
“And we’re still under it, despite the fact that freight was slightly more expensive than we anticipated. We also intend to visit at the end of the year. And when necessary, we’ll change the development. We established a budget cap and ought to adhere to it because anything is possible with enough will.
Ferrari Formula One car will receive fewer modifications; budget constraints are to blame.
The Ferrari director thinks that compared to pre-2020 levels, in-season car innovations will still be constrained by the Formula One budget limitation.
By:
Updated on:
In an effort to preserve money for this year’s brand-new technical regulations, the majority of Formula One teams put a stop to all car development during the previous season.
Due to budget cap restrictions, the Ferrari Formula One team is probably going to release fewer in-season car upgrades in 2022, according to Ferrari director Laurent Mekies. The spending limit has been reduced this year to a base amount of $140 million, excluding add-ons. The top Formula One teams must therefore exercise greater financial restraint.
The teams that spend a lot of money during the championship on vehicle developments will be greatly impacted by the expenditure cap. Ferrari, Red Bull, and Mercedes are some of these teams. To stay inside the financial limit, several teams have already drastically reduced the size of their squads.
How much money does F1 bring Ferrari?
For participating in the championship, each team receives about $36 million USD in prize money, which comes from sources of income like TV rights and circuit sponsorship.
Payments are also made based on how teams place in the Constructors Championship. Mercedes won $61 million USD for winning the championship in 2021, compared to Williams, who finished last, who only received $13 million USD.
Ferrari, the only team to earn this payout, received an additional $68 million USD solely for being a long-standing team.
For their prior efforts in the championship, McLaren, Red Bull, Mercedes, and Ferrari each received a “Constructors Championship Bonus” of $35 million USD.
Red Bull received $36 million USD for being the first team to sign the most recent Concord Agreement, and Williams received $10 million USD as a “legacy payment.”
Does F1 bring Ferrari additional revenue?
Ferrari’s famous red vehicles have become synonymous with Formula One racing. Without the Ferraris and their devoted followers, the Tifosi, an F1 season simply wouldn’t be the same. In fact, by paying Ferrari greater prize money, the sport’s commercial agreements incentivize Ferrari to compete.
Ferrari get greater prize money in F1 because they have been part of the F1 World Championship since the very first season in 1950. The most successful team in the history of the sport is Ferrari. Over and beyond all other prizes, they are given an additional $35 million each year.
Ferrari and Formula One have a rich history together. With the new commercial rights holder in charge, many aspects of the business relationship have also lately altered. Let’s have a look at some of the specifics to better appreciate why Ferrari gets extra revenue, merely for taking part.
What is the F1 budget?
F1 issued its first set of financial rules for the 2021 season, establishing a $145 million per team budget maximum initially for the year that was adjusted based on the number of races.
This decreased to $140 million for 2022 and was projected to decrease by an additional $5 million the following year, with a 3% indexation to account for inflation.
However, a number of teams have recently advocated for a change to be made to the budget cap due to the uncertain financial situation across the world as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine back in February, high levels of inflation, and rising freight prices.
It was announced at the most recent F1 Commission meeting on Friday morning in Austria that clearance had been given for the budget cap to rise by 3.1% in order to account for the demands put on it by rising costs and inflation.
Nine out of the ten teams, F1, the FIA, and the original plan’s 2023 indexation date were all in favor of moving it up to 2022.
High inflation rates at the end of last year, according to a statement from F1 and the FIA, have created “a risk of noncompliance with the financial requirements if actions are not taken,” necessitating intervention.
The statement reads, “Following conversation with the Financial Advisory Committee over the past few weeks, the FIA made a recommendations to the Commission that were supported by the FIA, Formula 1, and nine of the teams and were agreed by the needed majority.”
The proposal acknowledges the unforeseen rise in costs experienced by teams in 2022, allowing indexation at a restricted rate of 3.1% (which takes into account the initial 3% inflation barrier already set out in the regulations) and allowed compounding of this rate as of 2023.
The revised number increased by 3.1% for this year and will still be subject to the anticipated 3% indexation for 2023 due to the compounding of the rate.
Due to rising costs, Ferrari warned at the end of May that it had “no chance” of staying inside the budget cap for this year, while Christian Horner, the head of Red Bull F1, warned of a “catastrophe” due to the problem.
The head of Alfa Romeo, Frederic Vasseur, suggested that the larger organizations just develop their cars less to stay inside the restriction, which caused some of the smaller teams to be less willing to agree to a modification in the rules.
In other F1 Commission meeting news, authorisation was given for preseason testing to take place outside of Europe four days prior to the year’s first race.
Testing is only permitted at tracks in Europe, according current sporting regulations, unless the majority of teams agree otherwise.
The fact that testing took place in Barcelona and Bahrain this year makes it possible for Bahrain to host a single preseason test in 2023 before hosting the season’s opening round.
The F1 Commission also spoke about the stricter curfew regulations that were implemented this year as part of the updated race weekend schedule.
According to the statement, “To a significant extent, this has been successful. However, following the first half of the season, a number of areas for improvement have been found, particularly with regard to the parc ferme timings after qualification.”
This would ease the post-session pressure on teams and the FIA inspectors conducting technical checks by reducing the current 90-minute timeframe for parc ferme after qualifying on a Saturday to 30 minutes from next year.