Ferrari started six races near the end of 2019 but just one of them resulted in a pole position for the team. It came to an end with a clarification of the rules in the US Grand Prix, where the engine had to be changed to comply with the regulations.
The Ferrari was not found to be in violation of any laws by the FIA. Nevertheless, due in large part to an underperforming engine, the Ferrari was no longer able to compete at the same level for the following two races as a result of the regulation changes.
Ferrari, despite asserting its innocence, settled privately with the FIA about the engine of the car that year. Nothing was ever disclosed to the public.
The FIA declared that they had finished their research of the operation of the Scuderia Ferrari F1 power unit and had reached an agreement with Ferrari after extensive technical checks. The agreement’s specifics were kept private and between the parties.
The team was the most impacted by additional engine regulation modifications prior to the start of the 2020 season than any other team. When Ferrari’s team principal acknowledged that the company made a mistake when it chose a different wing design from all the other teams, it came as a shock. It clarifies why the automobile lost so much time turning.
It was noted that the Ferraris were, on average, 10 km/h slower than during the 2019 season at the Belgian Grand Prix in August 2020.
The Ferraris were substantially faster during the 2019 season, taking home numerous triumphs, particularly at Singapore, where they finished first and second. The triumph served as both Ferrari’s most recent Formula One victory and Vettel’s final race for the team.
In 2020, race results and average starting positions were significantly worse than in 2019. Ferrari should hold itself to higher standards.
Even with poor performance and no victories, Ferrari has had a successful year. Ferrari was fortunate to have made an investment in the 2021 vehicle and engine prior to the imposition of the new budget cap. To level the playing field and stop one side from dominating, the new spending cap was implemented.
In 2021 and 2022, respectively, the new budget cap starts at $145 million and $140 million. Between 2023 and 2025, it will remain at $135 million. Ferrari reportedly spends $400 million annually, according to estimates. In 2021, the modifications that racing teams may make to their vehicles were constrained.
Due to the relative stability and restrictions that will exist starting in the following year, Ferrari will have some difficulties in the aerodynamics department.
In the second half of the season, Ferrari was able to make a few improvements, which increased the car’s performance even though the results did not always reflect it. This indicated that the car was progressing in the right direction.
The basic development of the automobile was halted in 2021. Using the tokens permitted by the rules, which were spent in the back of the car, there were opportunities to enhance the Ferrari in specific areas.
With the most recent advancements in the region where development is unrestricted, a completely new power unit exists. The performance evaluations are good for the Ferrari team.
In This Article...
How Ferrari miscalculated its strategy in Hungary
BUDAPEST, Hungary — On Sunday evening, Ferrari offered up two alternative justifications for their disappointing performance in Hungary. Charles Leclerc, the race driver, faulted the strategy, and Mattia Binotto, the team manager, blamed the car’s performance.
The messaging between the team manager and the driver was noticeably different, even though the two statements weren’t entirely unrelated. Leclerc thought the race could have been won. By crossing the finish line in sixth place, he had closed the 80-point gap between himself and Max Verstappen for the championship. Binotto declined.
How did Ferrari perform in the most recent race?
On the 18th lap of the French Grand Prix on Sunday, Charles Leclerc’s Ferrari left the track and collided with the safety barriers, forcing him to withdraw while holding the lead.
Max Verstappen, the leader of the championship, raced to the front, ahead of Lewis Hamilton in a Mercedes, and Leclerc, who was unharmed in the collision, started from pole position.
The Monegasque, who won the last Grand Prix in Austria and started this race 38 points behind Verstappen, was on pace to repeat after dominating qualifying on Saturday.
However, Leclerc lost control of his Ferrari on the 18th loop of the Paul Ricard track at Le Castellet, spinning off and coming to a stop in the safety barriers at a low pace.
Similar to the throttle issue that prevented him from winning in Austria two weeks prior, this one seemed to be the cause of his failure.
When his condition was inquired about after the incident over the team radio, he yelled, “I cannot get off throttle.”
He let out a loud “Noooooo!” to express his annoyance, but he was still able to get out of the automobile without getting hurt.
What transpired during the Hungarian Grand Prix with Ferrari?
Charles Leclerc, who lost the race lead and ultimately finished sixth, called Ferrari’s choice to place him on hard tyres at the Hungarian Grand Prix “a nightmare.”
Leclerc overtook George Russell on lap 31 of the race on Sunday, having begun in second place and having stopped for new tires.
But when Max Verstappen, who was leading the world championship after starting 10th, stopped again, Ferrari reacted by bringing Leclerc in early for hard tyres, a compound that other cars had been having trouble with at the Hungaroring.
Leclerc’s move backfired as Verstappen passed him twice following a spin, forcing a third pit stop for soft tires that prevented him from finishing higher than sixth.
“Everything was in order when we went onto the hards for an unknown reason.
“I said on the radio that the medium was comfortable for me and that I intended to keep driving on those tyres as long as possible because it felt wonderful. I have no idea why we made a different choice.
“Sincerity speaking, I was pleased with the tempo on my side. The only issue is that everyone will undoubtedly recall my disastrous performance over the latter leg of the race, especially with the hards.
“I essentially lost the race there. I lost 20 seconds at the pit and an additional 6 seconds over the course of 5 grueling laps because I was all over the place with the tyre.
We thought the hards might have been quick enough to keep us in the race and attempt to hold a strong place by the closing laps, he said.
“Overall, they didn’t perform as we had anticipated, and I believe it was because the car didn’t perform as we had anticipated.
“I’m considering the season-long plan of action. We adopted the appropriate course of action in France and Austria; occasionally, we adopt the appropriate course of action, and occasionally we make mistakes on the other side.
Who leads Ferrari Formula One?
Italian engineer Mattia Binotto, who was born in Switzerland on November 3, 1969, is the team leader of the Formula One team Scuderia Ferrari. On January 7, 2019, he was chosen to take over the position from Maurizio Arrivabene. Italians make up his family.
Who is quitting the F1?
Daniel Ricciardo’s contract with McLaren has been “mutually agreed” to be terminated one year early, so the eight-time race winner will leave at the conclusion of the 2022 season.
Ferrari switched to hard tires; why?
As he described the reasoning behind the Italian team’s choice to transfer Leclerc onto the hard tyre, team manager Mattia Binotto claimed that Ferrari’s car was “not working as intended” in the race.
When reflecting on Friday and today’s race, Binotto said, “I think it is important to say that we believe the car was not working as expected and we didn’t have the speed we were hoping to have.
So while the weather today was undoubtedly different and grew cooler, generally our speed was insufficient, and regardless of the tyres we were using, I don’t believe we performed as well as we had hoped.
“And without a doubt, it was the same with the hard; when we fitted the hard, our simulation indicated that it would be a challenging couple of warm-up laps; they would have been slower than the mediums for 10 or 11 laps, but they would have caught up by the end of the stint – and it was a 30-lap stint.
Because it was a 30-lap stint and we were hoping to hold onto Max’s position, we installed the hard tyres at the time. On the soft, it undoubtedly would have been too long. Yes, it would be challenging at the beginning of the stint, but it would get easier by the conclusion, according to our decision and analysis.
“Overall, the tires weren’t functional. I am aware that they did not perform well on other cars, but I believe that the analysis we conducted was supported by the data we had available. As I previously stated, the primary cause is not the approach but rather why the car did not perform as well as we had hoped for today. I
“It was the first race this year where the car wasn’t as competitive as we are generally hoping for, and it was the situation with Carlos as well because he was on exactly the same strategy as Lewis and started first but finished second, and Lewis went on to finish second.
“So the automobile wasn’t running good today. Additionally, a poorly performing car prevents the tyres, especially the hard ones, from performing as they should.
When asked if he thought he could win the race, Binotto responded, “I don’t think so. Today, speed and pace were really what we lacked.
We couldn’t have won today, in my opinion. And I’m not sure why, but it was the first race in the first 13 that we didn’t have the necessary pace to take the win.
“You need to first examine it performance-wise to understand, and I’m confident that once we understand that, we will understand why the tyres weren’t functioning properly.”
Who is in charge of the Ferrari strategy?
Ignacio “Inaki” Rueda, a Spanish Formula One engineer, was born on August 6, 1978. He presently serves as the Scuderia Ferrari Formula One team’s sporting and strategy director.
Ferrari vs. Lamborghini: Which is superior?
Ferrari and Lamborghini are comparable in terms of driving image and personal style. There are some significant variations between each producer. Ferrari has a rich racing history, a certain sense of status, and nostalgia that many drivers desire. Lamborghini stands out as a car manufacturer that captures your attention and doesn’t let go by offering greater power and innovation. Both provide excellent driving sensations, speed, and elegance.
Why did Ferrari fit Leclerc with hard tires?
Ferrari’s choice to use a different tyre strategy for Charles Leclerc in the Hungarian Grand Prix has generated a lot of criticism, and Leclerc himself has been unable to provide an explanation. Team manager Mattia Binotto provided some explanation as to why the decision was made.
In an effort to shed some light on their highly debated strategy choice for Charles Leclerc in the Hungarian Grand Prix, Ferrari has sought to provide some justification.
The Monegasque, who started the race in third place, overtook teammate Carlos Sainz during the first round of pit stops before overtaking Mercedes’ George Russell to take the lead.
Leclerc extended his advantage over Russell, but when the second round of pit stops began, a quick Max Verstappen pulled in front, prompting Ferrari to react.
Leclerc was chosen to run on Hard tyres, however due to problems warming them up, he slipped behind Verstappen and Russell, who were using Medium tyres.
Leclerc finally had to be brought in for a third time by Ferrari in order to switch to the Soft tyres, which caused him to finish the race in sixth place.
I don’t know why we made a different decision, but I said on the radio that I was very comfortable with the Medium tyres and that I wanted to go as long as possible with those tyres because the feeling was good. Leclerc himself appeared baffled as to why the decision to use the Hard compound had been made after the race.