In order to resolve a class-action lawsuit over claims of unintended acceleration, Toyota recently agreed to pay $1.1 billion. Some predict that the expenses might easily reach $3.1 billion when combined with ongoing litigation and sums already paid out for recalls. How could this happen to a business that has built and upheld a solid reputation for so long?
Some contend that as Toyota expanded too quickly, its quality declined. On the other side, quality experts assert that despite Toyota’s rapid expansion, quality has remained above average for the sector. In reality, the luxury brand Lexus from Toyota frequently sets the standard for quality in the sector. One simple response stands out. Toyota’s failures in marketing and crisis management were evident.
Toyota was unsure on how to respond to the first reports of self-acceleration issues. Toyota representatives responded to the concerns in a manner that baffled marketing and crisis management specialists rather than stating that they are looking into the issues and will publish a thorough report once they are finished. They misled everyone by drawing hasty conclusions and making several causes appear to be related at once. As the most common source of self-acceleration issues in cars, they initially blamed operator mistake for the issue (the issue that nearly triggered demise of Audi in the US market during the mid-1980s).
Toyota then asserted that floor mats that entrapped the gas pedal were the root of the issue. Some engineers cited “sticky gas pedals” as the cause. Then it was suggested that the unwanted acceleration was due to malfunctioning electronics. Toyota’s actions, rather than calming the market, made owners worry for their safety and potential buyers search for alternative makes and models. In response to Matt Lauer’s cross-examination, Jim Lentz, president and chief executive officer of Toyota Motor Sales, USA, appeared on the Today Show and appeared to be a “deer in headlights.” A pre-Lentz poll found that 37% of respondents were less likely to purchase Toyota vehicles. After he finished speaking, the negative percentages increased to 56%. Toyota and their dealership network suffered further losses due to steep discounts and the implementation of the recalls as a result of the confusion that Toyota reps had caused.
Automobiles of all makes and models occasionally develop problems. However, putting these problems into context requires contrasting them with similar makes and models from rival manufacturers. The statistics did not support the idea that Toyota cars had significant flaws, despite the media’s efforts to spread this idea. According to a conclusive joint investigation by NASA and the National Highway Safety Administration, there are no electronic vulnerabilities in Toyota cars that could result in risky self-acceleration problems. The problems with the floor mats and sticky gas pedals were refuted by Jeffrey Liker, a specialist who has tracked Toyota for over 27 years, in a 2010 article for Business Week. With 15 models in 2012, Toyota came in first place on the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety’s list. The 2012 Toyota Camry received a 5-star certification from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. This is not to argue that specific cars didn’t have issues-causing defects. Any human-made electromechanical device has the potential to break down. There doesn’t appear to be any conclusive evidence that there was a widespread issue with Toyota cars.
Toyota should have hired the best marketing talent they could find to handle the complaints when unintended acceleration initially came to light, while their engineers and independent specialists looked into the causes. Their marketing department need to have “published the investigation proving that the company was listening to the complaints and completely in control of the problem” until the root causes were identified. They were acting out of control already. They ought to have used the rumor procedure if the complaints turned out to be rumors:
- Notify no one about the rumor (any more than the media already had).
- Encourage the refutation of the rumor’s claims (using qualified marketing executives).
- Give evidence to back up the claim that Toyota cars are among the safest on the market (quoting the IIHS and NHTSA data above).
If it was determined that the complaints contained true facts, the marketing team ought to have used the fact procedure, which entails the following steps:
- Admit the mistake and extend an apology (s).
- restrict the range (point out the fact that Toyota has more models on the road than any other automobile maker).
- proposed a fix, like a new Quality Control Procedure, to make it unlikely that the flaws will occur again.
I am aware of certain people’s opinions. The aforementioned advice is “easier said than done at the time when Toyota was hammered with bad press from virtually everywhere. That may be the case, but the fact still stands that Toyota did not handle the problem in the best way, leading to millions of dollars in needless expenses.
Toyota should have produced an advertisement that openly said that there is no better time than the present to acquire a Toyota in addition to adhering to the proper processes. The advertisement should provide sufficient independent, verifiable evidence to support historical quality and safety promises, as well as an extended guarantee that would allay Toyota consumers’ concerns. This would have cost much less than Toyota ultimately did and probably prevented the severe harm to its previously spotless reputation.
The one benefit from Toyota mishandling this problem was that it made the necessary corrections to retake the top place from General Motors. Hopefully, it also realized that building a better car is not enough to maintain the top rank. The business must also improve communication.
In This Article...
How did Toyota handle the situation?
Additionally, each recall affects 1.7 million automobiles. All 2009 and 2010 Pontiac Vibes, which share the same manufacturing facility as the Toyota Matrix and are mechanically identical, are also impacted.
According to Toyota, the new, revised gas pedals will be installed in recalled vehicles. Owners are encouraged to remove floor mats and contact their neighborhood Toyota dealer with any issues until their car is serviced. Toyota recommends that any driver who notices their car accelerating accidentally shift into neutral, hit the brakes, pull off the road, and turn off the engine. Owners of cars with push-button starters should be aware that, if the car is not in Park, the engine must be turned off by holding the button down for three seconds.
Why was there a recall crisis at Toyota?
The most difficult situation in Toyota’s history began in August 2009 when a dealer installed an all-weather floor mat from an SUV improperly into a loaner Lexus sedan. As a result, the accelerator became stuck, resulting in a tragic, fatal accident. This renowned business, which stands for reliability and excellence, was demonized by the […]
What financial losses did the recall cause Toyota?
Despite suffering greater losses than anticipated as a result of its global recall and the beginning of a U.S. investigation into its star model, Toyota’s forecast for its current fiscal year is still upbeat.
The automaker anticipates spending around $2 billion or 180 billion yen on the global recall involving faulty accelerator pedals and the ensuing stoppage of sales and manufacturing. Analysts estimated the cost at around $1.1 billion earlier in the week, but they also included the cost of potential future brand damage.
Toyota projects that the loss of sales from the accelerator recall will lower earnings by 70 to 80 billion to 100 billion yen, and that fixing the faulty gas pedals and floor mats will cost an additional 100 billion yen. The Japanese manufacturer already had a 16 percent decline in sales in January, while Detroit’s competitors saw double-digit growth.
As it was working to resolve its gas pedal recall, reports of Prius braking issues started to appear both internationally and domestically. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is formally looking into 124 motorist reports of reduced braking performance. On Thursday, the Department of Transportation said that it would investigate Prius brake concerns. There have reportedly been four accidents because of the issue. Japan gave Toyota the go-ahead to look into similar events involving Prius brake issues on Wednesday.
The automobile manufacturer is nevertheless upbeat about its economic year in spite of the safety worries. After losing 437 billion yen the previous fiscal year, Toyota projected a profit of 80 billion yen for the year ending March 31. The automaker has not included any costs for a potential Prius recall in its forecasts, but it is a significant improvement over a previous expectation of a 200 billion yen loss for the entire year.
The third quarter’s net income came to 5.3 trillion yen, up 10.2 percent over the same period the previous year. From a loss of 164.6 billion yen a year earlier, net profit increased to 153.2 billion yen.
Toyota’s American depositary receipts fell 3% to $71.26 in New York on Thursday amid general market weakness.
What resulted from Toyota’s poor handling of the safety concerns?
Jim Lentz, a Toyota representative, stated that you must be able to hear your customers as well as hear them.
Update: It has been made clear that the plaintiffs’ lawyers in the multi-district litigation class-action lawsuit have not been able to provide evidence to support their claims that engine software bugs could result in uncontrollable acceleration.
In Los Angeles Toyota Motor Corp. was in the same predicament General Motors is in right now four years ago: brought before Congress for a public flogging over car faults, at the mercy of regulators, and at the mercy of plaintiff attorneys who smelt blood.
Could GM benefit from whatever Toyota learnt from their unintended acceleration crisis?
Lentz claimed Toyota’s recall crisis taught the manufacturer to be “far more transparent, both inside and outside the firm,” despite his refusal to explicitly address GM’s situation.
In order to effectively serve your consumers, Lentz advised that you must be able to listen to them, as opposed to simply hearing what they have to say. “In our situation, it’s all about openness, quickness, and listening.”
Already, it appears that GM is adopting Toyota’s motto, “You can never be too careful,” by recalling cars for problems that could have previously only called for a dealer service bulletin. GM has recalled 13.8 million vehicles in the US and 15.8 million globally so far this year. At the height of the crisis, Toyota recalled 16 million cars worldwide between late 2009 and early 2010.
Today, Lentz remarked, “everyone has a much better antenna.” “We are better able to delve deeper and pinpoint problems before they materialize. There are more recalls as a result. However, by using analytics, we can take data and make connections that might not have been possible otherwise. Because we are making connections more quickly, we are recalling cars early.”
Toyota eventually recalled more than 6 million vehicles to fix their sticky accelerator pedals and floor mats, but because of its tardiness, the Justice Department settled with Toyota for $1.2 billion, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration levied three fines totaling almost $50 million.
Toyota was accused by the agencies of hiding its knowledge of safety flaws. Toyota acknowledged “that it misled U.S. consumers by concealing and making false claims about two safety concerns affecting its vehicles, each of which produced a sort of unintended acceleration” as part of a deferred prosecution agreement with the Justice Department.
Toyota has acknowledged that its floor mats and pedals have flaws, but it vehemently rejects assertions that engine software flaws might result in unmanageable acceleration, which plaintiff attorneys have been unable to prove in the multi-district litigation class-action lawsuit.
Lentz said there is a relationship even though the recall situation wasn’t specifically mentioned when Toyota announced last month that it would be moving its headquarters. According to Lentz, the consolidation of executive operations for sales, marketing, production, and engineering at a single site will improve department-to-department communication and prevent crises like the one in 2010 in the future.
When dealing with clients and authorities, “your speed has to increase,” he stated. “We have made enormous progress in what we do now compared to then. We are paying closer attention so that we can comprehend what is happening rather than just focusing on the technical problems.”
How did Toyota get better?
All of the major automakersToyota, Honda, Nissan, Mitsubishi, Subaru, Lexus, Scion, Suzuki, Acura, and Infinitiwere harmed in some way by the earthquake and tsunami in Japan. All of these firms suffered as a direct result of this catastrophe, albeit some were struck worse than others (Honda may have been the hardest hit). In actuality, the earthquake also had a negative impact on many American automakers.
Toyota and Japan as a whole recover from a severe natural disaster more quickly than anyone anticipated.
The cause? Suppliers construct cars, not automakers. Every component of a car, with the exception of the engine, is built by a supplier before being assembled by the automaker. Although 10,000+ suppliers built the wiring harnesses, wheels, wood grain interiors, etc., Toyota may claim credit for the finished product.
When a natural disaster struck Japan, thousands of suppliers, both large and small, also suffered. A complete absence of electricity for weeks on end affected all suppliers, while some plants entirely collapsed, the majority sustained some sort of damage. As Japan recovered, production of American-made cars like the Tundra, Tacoma, and Camry slowed to a crawl because Toyota’s assembly factories all over the world were dependent on Japanese suppliers.
Toyota executives have stated that full production won’t return until 2012 and that recovery will take the remainder of the year. Amazingly, none of those forecasts will materialize. Toyota expects to reach maximum production by September or October. What they did was as follows:
1. Suppliers receive free labor. Many autoworkers were instructed to stay at home in the days immediately following the earthquake. There was nothing they could do because there were no parts, no cars, and just little facility damage. However, Toyota gave their employees the chance to receive their full pay while assisting seriously impacted suppliers in restarting production. Toyota accelerated the process by paying its employees to assist their suppliers.
Additionally, establishing positive ties with suppliers now will benefit you in the long run. Toyota made a really astute decision.
2. Making use of less power. National electricity production was reduced as a result of the earthquake, which was one of Japan’s largest issues. Toyota (and many other Japanese businesses) have taken the following steps to assist in lowering the demand for electricity:
- severely restricting or completely ceasing to use air conditioning. Through the summer, Toyota employees will assemble automobiles in 84F temperatures.
- their “weekend” was shifted to Thursday and Friday. To lessen demand on those days, Toyota’s Japan plants will be closed on Thursday and Friday. They will reopen on Saturday and remain open through Wednesday.
- minimizing the number of lights on. In a Toyota office or factory in Japan, you won’t find a lit hallway. Most offices have dim lighting.
- requesting that employees use the stairs. Employees are encouraged to use the stairs whenever possible rather than the elevator to reduce the amount of electricity used.
3. Redesigning the supply chain for parts. Toyota executives and engineers have actively used a variety of strategies to decrease the number of parts bottlenecks. Temporary contracts to produce parts that a rival couldn’t build were offered to some suppliers who had fully functional plants. To aid in resolving issues at the factory, certain suppliers received support with engineering and disaster recovery. To lower the demand for essential parts, several vehicle options have been temporarily removed.
4. People perform their best under pressure. When a catastrophe occurs, people often assume the worst. Disasters, however, frequently inspire people to exert remarkable motivation and subsequent effort. Every link in Toyota’s supply chain has an employee working tirelessly to put Japan back on course.
Our ability to be most productive during our most difficult circumstances is a credit to humanity. Congratulations to Toyota, Toyota’s suppliers, and the people of Japan for promptly regaining control of the corporation (and their nation). The worst is over, even if there is still a lot of work to be done.