At Toyota, the emphasis is placed on teamwork as a function of personal self-actualization. Instead than being viewed as hotshots outside from the group, the model employees who act as teachers and mentors are seen as a mirror of the group in which leadership is dispersed. Teruo Suzuki, general manager of human resources, remarked, “Toyota is not the kind of organization where a chosen few shine. “It is deemed inappropriate to have a small group of people operate the business. Instead, Toyota relies on each employee to play to their strengths and show the company’s might as a whole.” []
A car is the result of the work of numerous individuals with various specialties. Watanabe remarked that “every single person is the principal player on the stage.” [] This mentality, which is founded on one of the founders’ beliefs outlined in Chapter 6 that everyone should win, is essential to up-and-in human resource management. Everyone benefits, but only to the extent that their efforts help the team as a whole, believing that strength results from the interaction of the many viewpoints. “On stage, everyone assumes a main role, but as a company, you want to set up a scenario in which one plus one results in three or even five, not two. I refer to that as a team “Watanabe continued by saying that the most crucial responsibility of managers is to foster this kind of teamwork. [] Toyota transcends the dichotomy by simultaneously promoting individual and team self-realization.
With the O’Reilly learning platform, order Extreme Toyota: Radical Contradictions That Drive Success at the World’s Best Manufacturer right away.
Members of O’Reilly have access to live online training as well as nearly 200 publishers’ worth of books, videos, and digital resources.
In This Article...
What is the culture of the Toyota organization?
Since Taiichi Ohno established and improved the Toyota Production System (TPS) in the 1960s and 1970s, it has served as the global standard for Lean implementation. It has been the subject of countless books and articles, but the society that supports its survival has received less attention. Jeffrey Liker and Mike Hoseus’ book, Toyota Culture, describes how Toyota chooses, trains, and inspires employees to dedicate themselves to the task of creating high-quality goods. [Note: The keynote address for the 2020 Continuous Improvement Conference will be given by Hoseus, a former HR executive of Toyota’s plant in Kentucky.]
Toyota’s use of lean thinking is mostly focused on culture. According to the firm, respect for people and continual improvement are the cornerstones of the Toyota Way. The cultural values of challenge, kaizen, respect, teamwork, and Genchi Genbutsu serve as the foundation for these (go and see for yourself). However, the inclination in the West is to see Lean as a toolset that may achieve particular goals. This may be because of cultural differences between Eastern and Western societies. Although that strategy can lead to improvement, it will lose steam without the underlying convictions and principles to support it.
It is evident that Western society provides unique difficulties for embracing Toyota’s cultural precepts because of its strong individuality, short-term outlooks, and alternative cause-and-effect thinking. Toyota Culture investigates how Toyota exported its culture to the United States and other nations. Toyota intelligently realized that it needed to adapt to national cultures while maintaining its key principles of training people, problem resolution, standardization, and long-term thinking.
The book explores Toyota’s efforts to pick workers that are prone to cooperation and will fit in well with the culture. The principles of servant leadership, clear and open communication, a clean and safe workplace, collaborative problem resolution, and visual management are among those that managers are taught to consistently promote and teach. The factory floor is where HR managers are expected to spend the majority of their time.
The People Value Stream is an intriguing component of Toyota’s cultural thinking. This is similar to the Product Value Stream in that it distinguishes between value-added and non-value-added time; however, in this case, it defines value-added time as that which is used to recruit qualified candidates, train them to produce high-quality work, involve them in improvement efforts, and motivate them to continue learning and improving. How often does your business provide value over the course of an employee’s career, in this perspective? A corporation can create a future vision and a strategy to address the gaps once it has a clear understanding of its current status. By doing this, you may demonstrate how true it is that a company’s most valuable resource is its workforce.
Anyone researching how to build a work environment that can help a company improve faster than its competitors should read Toyota Culture.
Do you think Toyota would have succeeded without its culture of teamwork or do you think it has succeeded because of it?
Do you believe Toyota would have thrived without its culture of cooperation or that it has benefited from it?
To a significant extent, in my opinion, Toyota’s success may be attributed to its culture of teamwork. Without it, the business performance in the auto sector would not be this successful and exceptional. The ability to achieve notable performance in comparison to individual accomplishment is the central concept of team culture. Employees with various or special skills are assembled to form a work team in a culture that values teams. Together, people participate in initiatives using their individual strengths and talents to help each other operate more efficiently.
A multinational company like Toyota is strongly influenced by workforce diversity, which includes a variety of workers from many cultures. As a result, individuals can contribute a variety of values, viewpoints, and concepts to the team, which helps to foster fresh experiences and improve the team’s motivation and productivity.
Additionally, with a team-oriented culture, work is performed more effectively and efficiently since Toyota is able to employ all available resources efficiently and generate high-quality products, which contributed to Toyota’s current success. Toyota is able to precisely assign jobs depending on each employee’s abilities by controlling their workforce…show more information… The obligation to always work to the best of one’s abilities ought to be ingrained. The management or team members must also make sure that there are regular gatherings or meetings to keep the members informed, engaged, and motivated. This is done while having a clear end goal in mind, being committed and reliable. The rivalry between various teams can also result in competition. This naturally increases members’ motivation and focus, encouraging them to give their all.
What components of Toyota’s organizational structure are the most crucial?
Tech advancements and skilled labor are two essential components of Toyota’s success.
How has Toyota’s organizational structure changed?
Toyota’s organizational structure is divided into divisions. In 2013, this structure underwent extensive modifications. This was perceived as a reaction to the safety concerns and associated product recalls that began in 2009. Toyota had a strong, centralized worldwide hierarchy in its previous organizational design, which was more akin to a spoke-and-wheel structure. All of the important choices were made by the company’s headquarters in Japan. All communications had to go through the headquarters and were not shared between individual business units. The lengthy response times of this organizational structure to safety concerns, however, drew harsh criticism. Following the 2013 reorganization, Toyota’s new organizational structure now primarily consists of the following features:
- worldwide hierarchy
- Regional divisions
- divisions based on products
Worldwide Hierarchy. Toyota’s 2013 restructure did not alter its global hierarchy. However, the company has given regional and business unit heads more decision-making authority in the present organizational structure. In essence, Toyota decentralized its decision-making procedures. All business unit leaders do, however, report to the company’s worldwide headquarters in Japan.
Divisions by geography. Eight regional divisions make up Toyota’s new organizational structure (Japan, North America, Europe, East Asia and Oceania, China, Asia and Middle East, Africa, and Latin America and Caribbean). The corporate headquarters receives reports from each area manager. Toyota is able to adapt its goods and services to local market demands because to the organizational structure’s regional divisions.
divisions based on products. The collection of divisions based on products is another aspect of Toyota’s organizational structure. There are four divisions within the company: (a) Lexus International; (b) Toyota No. 1 for operations in North America, Europe, and Japan; (c) Toyota No. 2 for operations in all other regions; and (d) Unit Center, which is in charge of operations pertaining to engines, transmissions, and other related components. The organizational structure of Toyota has a characteristic that encourages the growth of brands and product lines.
How does Toyota cultivate its partners and employees?
In a general sense, Toyota sees respect for people and constant progress as the two pillars of its ideology. Respect for customers, respect for society, respect for suppliers and dealers, and respect for staff are all defined in the Toyota Way standards. According to the Toyota Way whitepaper, “Our Company is dependant on the support and happiness of customers, investors, workers, business partners, and host societies who benefit from the added value Toyota delivers. Our ability to provide consumers with ever-greater satisfaction by prioritizing their needs over all others is essential to our ongoing success.
Toyota pledges to produce value for all people. Based on multiple examples and historical facts, the dedication is sincere. The following commitments are listed:
- Effective utilization of time is required. “Just one hour is equal to one person’s lifetime, which is an accumulation of time. Employees give the company their valuable time, so we need to make the most of it; otherwise, we are squandering their life. (Eiji Toyoda, previous CEO of Toyota Motor Corporation)
- Relationships are by their very nature long-term. One of the authors, for instance, questioned why a particular joint venture in India only provided its local partner a 10% share. The partner was the correct response “terrific. The senior management also mentioned that the local partner would eventually be expected to make enough money to purchase a larger stake of the business.
- The goal is to make collaborations successful. (For an illustration, look at the discussions under Managing Suppliers.) Sending senior managers out for months to enhance operations is one of the many strategies Toyota uses. Respect is important, but it’s also important to make a commitment to adding value for everyone.
Respect plays a significant role in determining whether a connection is transactional (one-time interaction) or relational (many interactions over time). Improvement, which balances respect, is another factor that determines success. Consider it in this way: Relationships that are transactional are similar to encounters between complete strangers in New York City who hoot at one another from their cars. They exist and cause conflict. By making people apprehensive of getting too close to another car, that very friction may help such interactions operate successfully. Honking at someone you know well and will see every day, such as a coworker or fellow student, is unacceptable when connections last a long time. Relational relationships can’t put up with rudeness or contempt, but respect needs to be tempered with demands for progress and involvement in the joint enterprise. If not, there will be less motivation to keep up with system changes and environmental changes.
There is also another implication of this focus. A person or an organization can be seen as improving through continuous improvement. As per The Toyota Way: “We think that each person possesses the creative ability to independently pursue their own personal objectives. We respect each team member’s values, skills, aptitude, perspective, and drive. The Toyota Way paper quotes Taiichi Ohno13, the inventor of the Toyota Production System, as saying “Working with subordinates involves a wit and wisdom competition.
Toyota workers are instructed to approach problems as though they were two levels higher in the hierarchy. Instead of regulations, Toyota prefers to provide broad objectives or ambiguous instructions. In our opinion, that strategy is utilized to cultivate the habit of evaluating and establishing one’s own goals. The exercise is essential to understanding how the system functions. A preferable strategy would be to inquire about the best way to provide drinking water rather than, for instance, requesting a provider to decrease the frequency of water delivery to a workplace.
Toyota evaluates managers based on five different types of subjective standards. One of them highlights how outcomes were attained, while the others focus on the manager’s gained respect and trust. According to Takeuchi, Osono, and Shimizu, desirable traits include modesty, a desire to mentor other employees, a readiness to listen and learn from others, passion for creating continual improvements, comfort working in teams, and the capacity to solve problems rapidly. Since speedy fixes to issues don’t appear consistent with modesty and a readiness to listen and learn, it is obvious that these standards are not only ambiguous but also rather incongruous. They offer much of opportunity for personal growth.
By pushing them to grow both within Toyota and in the wider network of partners and suppliers, the system aspires to create extraordinary individuals and teams that will adhere to the philosophy and comprehend the system. To help its suppliers understand and accept the company’s way, Toyota employs a variety of strategies (see Toyota Managing Suppliers). Ward and coauthors and Tae-Hoon15 explore the various degrees of connections that Toyota has with various suppliers in two excellent pieces. These partnerships range from suppliers receiving practically total design flexibility to suppliers receiving Toyota’s complete design. Once the design is complete, regardless of the connection that is used, the production processes always seem to adhere to the more meticulously crafted Toyota Way principles.
What does that strategy mean, exactly? Using the framework created above, we can say that different suppliers may have learned the Toyota system at varying levels of depth. That offers an alternative perspective on strategic sourcing. Using the term “strategic sourcing” (or “supplier scorecards”), we refer to two sourcing-related concepts:
- Prior to choosing a supplier, enormous effort is put forth, but unless the same level of effort (or more) is maintained, the supplier has a tendency to slacken.
- From a strategic consideration point of view, it is hard to maintain the same level of contact and relationship with all suppliers. Some may even be more significant than others.
The level of a supplier’s knowledge with both the buyer’s and the seller’s organizational structure and organizational procedures may be a third factor based on the Toyota Way. As a result, whether or not it is strategic, the supplier’s level of expertise and development is another factor.
Womack discusses several aspects of lean production in his weekly emails. The following anecdote was included in his most recent email from him: “Many years ago, when I first visited Toyota in Japan, I had dinner with the purchasing director and asked how he could be sure that Toyota was getting good performance from its suppliers when only two suppliers were used for a given category of need and when Toyota relied on target pricing rather than supplier bids. How do you know you aren’t being taken advantage of, I enquired? He said, “Because I know everythingevery detail of every value-creating processrunning from raw materials at suppliers through Toyota’s operations,” after giving an incredulous look. That’s what I do.
Related Posts
- The Rule: Find Reliable Partners and Develop Together for Long-Term Mutual Benefit – What might you learn if you attended a supply chain management conference? You’ll discover a lot about “streamlining the supply chain with cutting-edge IT.” If…
- Interview conducted on September 23, 2008, with Jeffrey Smith, Vice President and General Manager of Johnson Controls’ Toyota Business Unit, about how Toyota and suppliers collaborate as partners. The interview’s goal was to talk about the relationship between Toyota and its suppliers.
- Develop suppliers and partners as extensions of the business. Short-term cost savings vs. long-term partnerships in a globally competitive environment. Building a Lean Extended Enterprise Seven Characteristics of Supplier Partnering Supplier Partnership the Toyota Way Traditional vs.
- To Create an Extended Learning Enterprise, One Must Empower Others – I wondered why American Auto intended to take an elevator to the top without pausing at any of the intermediate floors as I pondered the supplier disaster and the company’s desire to…
- People Drive Continuous Improvement – When Toyota invests in its employees, it receives devoted workers who are punctual and dedicated to enhancing their operations on a daily basis. During one of
- Interview with Gene Tabor, General Manager of Purchasing-Supplier Relations, Supplier Diversity, and Risk Management, conducted on August 21, 2008, about how Toyota works with its suppliers The goal of the conversation was to go over how Toyota deals with its customers.
- The Fundamental Idea: Fostering Effective Teamwork While Fostering Excellent Individual Work – When discussing the Toyota Production System with a Toyota employee, it’s difficult to escape hearing a speech on the value of teamwork. There are systems in place to support the
- The Rule: Your People, Process, and Values Must Be Supported by the Adoption of New Technology – At Toyota, new technology is only used after it has undergone direct experimentation with a wide range of participants and been validated. This does not rule out fresh or…
- Value Stream Maps Created and Implemented Through Kaizen Workshops – CPC obviously isn’t only a technical or service company, and it resembles a manufacturing process in certain ways. Where can you locate an instance of TPS being effectively implemented?
- Revert to the Abacus to Make Technology Fit with People and Lean Processes? What Do You Think About People, Processes, and Technology? Fit Your People and Operating Philosophy to Technology Comparing Technology Adoption Models return to the