Have your Subject Vehicle’s frame examined at no cost by a Toyota Dealer to determine whether the frame needs to be replaced. An authorized Toyota Dealer will replace the vehicle’s frame for free if the inspection reveals that it has to be replaced.
In This Article...
Toyota started swapping out frames when?
One of the most dependable automobile manufacturers in the world is Toyota.
Purchase one, and drivers are nearly assured years of trouble-free driving, with the exception of several popular pickup truck frames.
Until a few days ago, when it started swerving, Jeanne Middleton’s 2004 Toyota Tacoma was a reliable companion.
They claimed that the frame was rusty, damaged, and hazardous to drive, Middleton added.
It needs a new frame, according to mechanic Mike Fehler, or the entire back end may come off.
According to Fehler, the load-bearing area where the leaf spring attaches to the frame is essentially what secures the truck bed to the vehicle.
Recalls on unsafe products save lives, as well as thousands of dollars in repairs.
However, many automakers place a time limit on them, and after, say, 15 years, they will no longer pay for a repair.
In 2016, Toyota made a deal to fix or buy back millions of rusted-out Tacoma, Tundra, and Sequoia SUVs. Models from 2004 to 2008, and occasionally 2010 were covered.
Make sure the manufacturer of the car has a current address on file for recalls or service bulletins to ensure that this doesn’t happen to other car owners. Additionally, determine if any unfixed recalls have been submitted by visiting recalls.gov.
Middleton stated, “I would love to keep my truck because I know it has another 100,000 miles in it. However, it needs a $7,000 frame repair to do that.
When did Toyota start having frame problems?
In 2016, Toyota agreed to pay $3 billion to fix millions of Tacoma, Tundra, and Sequoia SUVs with rusted frames as part of a settlement of a class-action lawsuit. Model years from 2004 to 2008 are affected (or 2010 in a few cases). This comes after an earlier extended warranty that applied to Toyota trucks between 1995 and 2003.
How much time does Toyota need to replace a frame?
Our automotive specialist responds to queries from two distinct Toyota owners who are worried about recall policies, time frames, and the safety of their trucks’ rusting frames.
A. The body of my 2009 Toyota Tacoma pickup truck is in excellent condition, and it has only 130,000 kilometers on it. Last week, when my mechanic was working underneath the car, he discovered a sizable hole and informed me that it will be rectified as part of a recall. When I called my local Toyota dealer, they advised me that the recall had already passed and there was nothing they could do. I then called corporate, who similarly informed me that nothing could be done. I was aware that my frame was subject to a recall, but I was unaware that the recall had a deadline. Please advise me on what to do; this feels like just one more gut-punch this year. B.W.
A. That you were ignorant of the deadline for the Toyota Tacoma recall is not surprising. That virtually usually holds true for safety recalls that fall under Transport Canada’s purview. In this instance, Transport Canada long ago concluded that the Tacoma’s rust takes time to form and is easily seen from underneath the truck before the structure becomes dangerous. Toyota’s campaign is therefore an internal recall that is carried out more like a warranty extension with a set amount of time for the repair. The frame of your truck must have been corroding for a long time before it was brought to your attention because it developed such a sizable hole.
The Tacoma’s applicable coverages, which change based on the model year, are as follows:
- 1995 to 2000 (15 years)
- 2005 to 2010 (12 or 15 years)
- 2011 to 2017 (12 years)
There is no mileage limit on the coverage. The most recent program requires a Toyota dealer to check the vehicle and apply further rustproofing by December 16, 2021.
This needs extensive repair. The truck’s body must be taken apart from the frame while a new frame and front suspension control arms are installed, which takes 40 to 50 hours of labor. Other parts that may have deteriorated along the way will also need to be removed and reinstalled. A repair like this often has a retail price of roughly $15,000, which is higher than the truck’s actual value. Even said, the majority of Tacoma owners are devoted to their trucks and would prefer to have them fixed rather than having Toyota buy them back.
Toyota Canada once seemed more accommodating with exceptional circumstances, occasionally extending its warranty beyond the predetermined limits on a case-by-case basis. However, the limits appear to have changed when Toyota settled a class action lawsuit, and coverage for more recent programs was reduced to 12 years. According to the Automobile Protection Association (APA), Toyota will stand behind a car if it has been examined, the frame has been rustproofed, but the corrosion is still significant. Nevertheless, Toyota seems to be acting more firmly than in the past, confining coverage to the conditions of the class action settlement. Once the program is publicized, one of the primary goals of a class action settlement for an automaker is to put an end to all other claims for the problem. Could Toyota still be obligated to offer the program’s remedies to those affected by this issue given that many people did not receive alerts because the trucks were already old (addresses may have changed, and trucks may have changed owners)? Although it seems like they should, the public announcements that nearly typically accompany settlement proposals will, in theory, inform all Toyota owners of the recall.
Any problems with the frame ought to be noted by the Toyota dealership if you are a regular customer before the guarantee expires. Every standard maintenance procedure includes checking the undercarriage for flaws. It is likely that the work was done by less experienced workers who were not aware of what to look for on the frame if you only want an oil change, which is not regarded as a full maintenance service.
The authorized Toyota dealership you frequently visited could be held liable for failing to address a safety recall or preventive program that a private owner is not aware of if they failed to discover problems with the frame. Dealers frequently miss doing this. According to the APA, a Tacoma owner who brings their pickup in for maintenance at a Toyota dealership is not required to be informed of Toyota’s recall terms, especially if they did not receive a warning. You should expect more from a professional with experience working on your particular brand of car than you would from a regular repair shop. A franchised dealership has a responsibility to inform you of any active safety recalls and other programs that apply to your vehicle when doing routine maintenance that necessitates an inspection.
The APA was recently made aware of a complaint made against a Montreal Toyota dealership. Six months after the warranty ended, the dealer called attention to the corrosion and informed the customer that his Tacoma was hazardous. The owner, a devoted customer, claims that the dealership owed him a repair under the lifetime rustproofing warranty they sold him or to have flagged the corroding frame years earlier. Before the matter is tried, a few more years will pass.
Q. My 2012 Toyota Tacoma received an inspection and maintenance in August 2020 at my local Toyota store. They categorized the frame’s rust at the time as “ordinary surface rust My dealer therefore used the corrosion resistant compound (CRC).
However, I’ve lately seen that since the frame inspection, the rust has advanced. I went back to my local Toyota dealer in March 2021. I was told that the deterioration is not in the part of the frame where rust is an issue in order to explain why. The manager described how the procedure entails hammering the frame; if the frame is perforated, the car can no longer be driven, and a new frame must be installed. The hammer is considered drivable and is serviced with the CRC if it does not puncture the frame. I find it worrying because the instant the frame is hammered through, it becomes unsafe.
Two mechanics then looked over my vehicle. A mechanic struck the frame with a hammer. Dust and rust flakes occasionally dropped to the ground, but it didn’t perforate. The mechanic noted that his 2005 Toyota Tacoma looks identical and that all trucks rust. Although I appreciate the mechanic’s efforts to reassure me, it was not consoling to learn that my 2012 Tacoma was being compared to a truck that was seven years older. According to the dealership, no frames on 2012 vehicles have yet been replaced; all of the replacements were at least a few years older.
The extent of the rusting looks to be much more severe than typical surface rust, despite the fact that the vehicle structure has not perforated. It appears to me that Toyota’s CRC treatment is not totally effective; the level of corrosion on the vehicle frame is more severe than usual. This is despite several applications of extra rustproofing from Krown Rust Control to assist. I left the appointment with a lot of unresolved questions. My main thinking at the time was: “Will my car require a new frame a few years when Toyota’s warranty extension program for Tacoma pickups from 2011 to 2017 expires? B.W.
A. The dealership’s openness and diligence in your situation make it intriguing. Their options are limited, which is unfortunate because they are unable to take any action without Toyota Canada’s permission under the recall program. You have every right to be concerned that it would be a risk to ignore the issue for a number of years until the frame failed the perforation test.
The majority of Toyota truck owners who get in touch with the Automobile Protection Association (APA) do so after a dealer has declared their truck to be inoperable. About a dozen complaints from Toyota owners who think their trucks were overlooked under the warranty extension scheme have been sent to the APA. Additionally, we are aware of other instances where Toyota revitalized worn-out, high-mileage trucks with over 250,000 kilometers; this goes much beyond what most manufacturers would do to cover a manufacturing flaw.
Honestly, compared to many others I have seen, the photographs you gave of your frame don’t appear as awful. It seems like the extra rust treatments you have been doing might have been beneficial. Have you thought about reaching out to Krown Rust Control to see if they have any advice to offer? The Tacoma’s frame has holes in it, some of which are expected to receive plugs as part of the recall, and the Krown product is meant to be particularly effective in boxed parts of the frame as long as there is access for their spray wands to get inside. Additionally, if a preventive repair to your frame is necessary, the Krown warranty ought to cover it. On the APA website, there is a page that details the sensitive places that require further protection. For further information on automobiles, see:
Will Toyota swap out my 4Runner’s frame?
The overly rusted frame of your 4Runner will be replaced for free by Toyota Motor Corporation if you decide to launch your product liability lawsuit with the aid of our legal team. Toyota Motor Corporation is accountable for producing cars with improperly treated undercarriages.
When did Tacomas’ frames start to rust?
As a more portable alternative to larger half-ton trucks like the Ford F-150, the Toyota Tacoma made its dbut in 1995. There have been several setbacks along the way, with certain years experiencing problems with rusted frames, failing leaf springs, and defective transmissions. Despite this, it is now among Toyota’s most well-liked vehicles.
Since the later models of the Tacoma are more likely to be for sale online or on dealer lots, we’ll focus on them in our study.
The Tacoma experienced double-digit annual recall counts from 2005 to 2010 along with thousands of combined complaints, many of which are related to premature rusting problems that might eat through the frame or break leaf springs.
Faulty Frames Could Leave the Pickup with Severe Rust that May Eat Holes Through the Frame
Numerous complaints from Tacoma owners between 2005 and 2010 claimed their frames had excessive rust, rot, and corrosion. Some truck owners claimed that substantial frame damage from rust that had spread to other parts of the truck’s frame prevented their vehicles from passing inspection.
In the end, Toyota handled the recall properly and provided the information in a fairly open manner. More significantly, the company paid drivers $3,000,000,000 to resolve the rusted-frame issue. Tacomas were once again the most impacted vehicles from 2004 through 2010.
Corroded Leaf Springs Can Brake and Puncture the Fuel Tank, Possibly Causing Leak or Fire Risk
The leaf springs above the back axle are subject to one NHTSA recall. Due to a potential hazard where the springs could break and increase the risk of a fire, over 710,000 trucks had to be recalled. If a leaf spring were to break under stress or from corrosion while being driven, it may move, come into touch with the fuel tank and possibly puncture it, releasing petrol. All damaged vehicles receive replacement rear leaf spring assemblies from Toyota, and the frame-corrosion warranty has been increased to 15 years.
Other Issues Include Loose Seatbelt Screws, Airbags that may not Deploy, and a Gas Pedal that May Stick
Seatbelt screws that might gradually loosen over time and possibly lead to the pre-tensioner detaching if excessive pressure is applied are one problem that only particular Access Cab models are susceptible to. Over 342,000 Tacomas were apparently affected by this issue.
An further recall relates to Toyota Tacomas with a driver’s side airbag that might not deploy in an accident because of a defective flexible flat cable that might prematurely wear out when twisting the steering wheel.
The Tacoma was also a part of a significant recall involving almost 4.5 million Toyota vehicles, where a defective design could cause the gas pedal to become stuck in the fully-accelerated position.
When was the frame of the Toyota Tundra recalled?
To repair excessive rust on the vehicle’s frame, Toyota will recall 110,000 Tundra vehicles from the 20002003 model years.
To repair excessive rust on the vehicle’s frame, Toyota Motor Corp. will recall 110,000 Tundra trucks from the 20002003 model years. In order to prevent the spare tire from falling onto the road and endangering other vehicles, the government advised owners to remove it from the frame.
The 20002003 model year Tundras registered in 20 “cold weather” states and the District of Columbia are subject to the recall that was issued on Tuesday. Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin are the states in question.
After receiving 20 reports of “serious frame corrosion,” the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration launched an inquiry into excessive rust on Tundra frames in October. The spare tire, which was kept under the truck bed, allegedly came off from the frame, according to 15 reports, the NHTSA reported at the time. According to five other investigations, the rust is to blame for broken brake lines.
Road salts and chemical deicers are frequently used to treat roads during the winter and might cause extra corrosion in the trucks, according to Toyota, which said on Tuesday that it was recalling the trucks in the cold weather states.
Toyota announced that it will start notifying owners in December and asking them to bring their trucks to a Toyota dealer for an inspection of the rear cross-member of the frame. According to Toyota, the cross-member assembly will be changed if the examination reveals that it can no longer support the spare tire in a secure manner.
The dealer will come up with a temporary fix, such as taking out the spare tire and strapping it to the truck bed, if replacement parts are not readily accessible.
Toyota stated that owners will have a corrosion-resistant substance put to the frame if no major rust is observed. Toyota stated that owners will not be charged for the inspections or repairs.
Owners of 2000-2003 Tundras registered outside of states with harsh winters will also be contacted, according to NHTSA, and their cars will be inspected and fixed if they so want.
Toyota stated that customers may “Remove the spare tire to reduce the possibility of it detaching from the rear cross-member. If you decide to do this, please make sure you are not underneath the spare tire carrier or rear cross-member when it is being lowered.” Additionally, the car manufacturer advised customers to store the spare tire in the truck bed or other parts of the car.