Over the past few years, the compact SUV and crossover segments have become the most congested in the industry as nearly every manufacturer has introduced their own interpretations of what an urban utility vehicle should look and feel like. Since the segments are so competitive, some firms have even abandoned sedans and hatchbacks in favor of concentrating solely on SUVs. Of these, Mitsubishi is one.
The RVR is the entry-level SUV in the Mitsubishi lineup, and as it hasn’t been the focus of the company’s attention in 10 years, it’s simple to overlook. You did read that correctly. The model hasn’t altered much in the last ten years.
It has, of course, undergone a number of changes, the most recent of which, from 2019, gave the RVR a family-appropriate appearance. But its platform is the same as the one that was unveiled at the start of the previous decade. Although there was little innovation, Mitsubishi Canada acknowledged that the RVR was their best-selling vehicle of 2018. Aged doesn’t always mean terrible.
So the 2020 upgrade came with a larger touchscreen and a new, more contemporary design, which in principle sounds good, right? Disappointment, however, is soon to follow once you see and interact with it, especially if you started your automobile shopping binge at Hyundai or even Toyota.
The infotainment system is shockingly boring and unbelievably simple for a 2020 model year. The RVR’s system is, at best, dull in comparison to some of Mitsubishi’s rivals who appear to take care and delight in creating aesthetically pleasing interfaces. Mitsubishi also adheres to the trend of reducing available alternatives to favor the Apple CarPlay and Android Auto platforms (which is optional). That means that even though I was driving a top-of-the-line GT, I was unable to use any kind of navigation system unless I had my smartphone plugged in.
Let’s refer to the dashboard as “basic and uncomplicated Given that the layout is almost as ancient as the platform itself, it won’t win any design prizes. But I have to give it to Mitsubishi: it works well and is easy to use.
I also saw certain flaws with the vehicle’s quality. As I drove in the city, braking and accelerating alternately, I noticed that my driver’s seat shook in its tracks. Road noise was amplified by the cabin’s weak soundproofing, and little plastic-like rattles were produced by road imperfections. Considering the $36k price tag that comes with the GT trim level, I wasn’t very satisfied with the experience.
Not all of the model is awful. Over the years, it has developed an admirable reputation for being incredibly dependable. Additionally, with a 10-year powertrain warranty, Mitsubishi still provides the best warranty in the business.
The 2.4L four-cylinder engine also performs admirably. Although it won’t win you any races, takeoffs are quick enough, and operating the CVT isn’t too terrifying, which is probably because the expectations weren’t great to begin with.
The vehicle also has the company’s part-time all-wheel drive, known as all-wheel control. That simply means that the front wheels receive the majority of the power by default, which is better for the environment. When you push the absurdly large “By pressing the AWC button on the console, the rear wheels are looped in and the car becomes a true all-wheel drive capable of plowing through snow. Having discretion over where the power is transmitted is advantageous in my opinion given that the majority of life conditions do not need having the AWD enabled at all times.
Because I am familiar with Mitsubishi’s capabilities, I truly wanted to enjoy the 2020 Mitsubishi RVR. One of the best plug-in hybrids on the market right now, in my opinion, is the Outlandermore particularly, the PHEV model. The RVR structure that the company is using is the source of the issue. It’s not a horrible car, but in order to stay competitive, it needs much more than a facelift.
- 2020 Mitsubishi RVR GT AWC model
- Engine: I-4, 2.4L, 168 hp, 167 lb-ft of torque
- All-wheel drive and a CVT transmission
- 10.3 / 8.3 NRCan rating (L/100km city/highway)
- 2,670 mm is the wheelbase
- Base, as tested, $25,015; plus freight, $36,013
- Competition includes the Hyundai Kona, Kia Sportage, Chevrolet Trax, Jeep Compass, Ford EcoSport, Nissan Qashqai, Mazda CX-3, and Subaru Crosstrek.
- Active Stability Control, Traction Control Logic, Brake Assist, Hill Start Assist, Lane Departure Warning, Forward Collision Mitigation, Blind Spot Warning, Rear Cross Traffic Alert, All-Wheel Control with Drive Mode Selector are all included as standard equipment. automatic climate control, six-way power driver seat, heated front seats, cellular phone interface with Bluetooth for hands-free, Keyless entry with panic alert and push-button start using FAST-Key, sat-radio service SiriusXM, back-up camera, audio controls located on the steering wheel, Warming the steering wheel
In This Article...
Why is the Mitsubishi RVR flawed?
The RVR is an extremely dated product that was first released in North America ten years ago. Yes, there have been a few updates, but nothing significant. The same applies for 2020, save for a minor change to the front fascia, the inclusion of three new body colors, and the incorporation of LED lights at both ends.
The two accessible engines are far far from cutting-edge technology. The optional 2.4-litre engine is powerful enough with 168 horsepower and 167 pound-feet of torque, while the regular 2.0-liter engine generates 148 horsepower and 145 pound-feet of torque. Both, however, are coupled to a constantly variable transmission and immediately begin to protest as the throttle is depressed.
The 2020 Mitsubishi RVR is not particularly enjoyable to drive. Again, the main issue is the extreme noise, which comes from the engine as well as the wind, the road, and the suspension. Furthermore, the ride is not the smoothest in town, and the steering is not the greatest in the segment.
How far can a Mitsubishi RVR travel?
When kept up to date with routine maintenance and service intervals, the durable Mitsubishi Outlander compact crossover SUV may travel between 200,000 and 250,000 miles before needing replacement. If you drive 15,000 miles per year, it can last 13 to 17 years before needing expensive repairs.
How trustworthy is Mitsubishi?
Breakdown of the Mitsubishi Reliability Rating. With a reliability rating of 4.0 out of 5, Mitsubishi is ranked 6th among all automobile brands out of 32. This evaluation is based on the average of 345 different models. The average yearly repair cost for a Mitsubishi is $535, which indicates that its ownership expenditures are higher than normal.
The Mitsubishi RVR uses how much fuel?
The ES, SE, SEL, LE, and GT are the five trim levels available for the 2021 Mitsubishi RVR. The MSRP for the entry-level ES trim is $24,948. Therefore, the 2021 Mitsubishi RVR is the best option available if you’re searching for a reasonably priced subcompact SUV. But when we buy a car, price is simply one factor to take into account.
You will be amazed with the Mitsubishi RVR’s engine characteristics for 2021. A 2.0-liter inline-4 cylinder engine with 148 horsepower is what powers the 2021 Mitsubishi RVR. The 2021 Mitsubishi RVR has a city and highway fuel rating of 9.7 gallons per 100 kilometers and 7.8 liters per kilometers, respectively. The 2021 Mitsubishi RVR has a large 63 liter fuel tank capacity.
Let’s finally look at the 2021 Mitsubishi RVR’s safety features. With equipment like ABS, braking assist, front and side airbags, and power locks, the automobile provides you with a sense of security each time you get behind the wheel.
As a result, we wholeheartedly urge you to consider the 2021 Mitsubishi RVR as a good subcompact SUV option.
Are Mitsubishi vehicles durable?
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a reasonably dependable vehicle that, with routine maintenance and cautious driving, can go between 150,000 and 200,000 kilometers. It may operate for 1013 years at 15,000 miles per year before requiring any excessively costly or uneconomical repairs.
Does Mitsubishi maintain its value?
Toyota tops the list with vehicles that, on average, depreciate only 42.3% after five years of ownership. This is less than the worldwide average of 49.6%.
The reliability of the brand helps Toyota automobiles maintain their value across all vehicle sectors, according to Ly.
Two Dodge and Mitsubishi vehiclesout of the ten on the listhave depreciation rates that are higher than the industry average (51.4 and 51.8 percent, respectively). These, however, are still more expensive than the car companies that lose the most value, such as Maserati at 66.4 percent and Buick at 60.1 percent on average.
Do Mitsubishi’s issues frequently arise?
But it’s obvious that something has changed. Mitsubishi has slipped down the list of automotive brands in recent years and is now among the least trustworthy ones. They were listed by Consumer Reports as one of the worst automakers in 2016. They scored just 51, placing them third from the bottom. Although Consumer Reports gave them an average reliability rating, they were not given a model recommendation. Ouch.
Mitsubishi SUVs are they dependable?
Breakdown of the Mitsubishi Outlander Reliability Rating. The Mitsubishi Outlander has a 4.0 out of 5.0 reliability rating, which places it 8th out of 26 compact SUVs. It has cheaper ownership costs than the national average due to the $519 average annual repair cost.
Which Mitsubishi has the best reliability?
According to automobile warranty expert Warranty Direct, the Mitsubishi Lancer is THE most dependable car of the past 15 years.
Warranty Direct, which is presently commemorating its 15th anniversary, examined more than 200,000 active and closed policies from the fifteen years prior to 1997, when it first began keeping track of dependability information.
Its Reliability Index ranks more than 450 distinct models using a complicated system that takes into account information including how frequently a car breaks down, how much it costs to fix it, as well as average age and miles.
With the exception of the Vauxhall Agila, which ranks second on the list, Japanese and Far Eastern automakers have dominated the index’s annual survey in recent years. Since 1997, they have made up the majority of the top 10 most reliable automobiles.
Suzuki’s Alto comes in third on the list, followed by the Toyota Aygo in fourth. The Mazda MX-5, Mercedes-Benz E-Class, Toyota Yaris, and Honda Jazz all tie for fifth place, followed by the Honda HR-V and Volvo S40.
Mitsubishi discontinued producing the Lancer’s most reliable model in 2008, yet despite this, fewer than one in ten of them broke down in a given year, with axle and suspension issues accounting for nearly two-thirds of garage visits.
The second-placed Agila, meanwhile, has a breakdown probability that is 3% higher but has an average repair cost that is barely a third of that of the Lancer.
The Mazda MX-5 is so reliable that it is the only model to have appeared twice in Warranty Direct’s top 20 of the last 15 years, with the 19982005 model coming in at number 11.
With two entries each, Toyota and Honda perform best among the top 10, and the supermini class of tiny cars tops the list of the most dependable cars on the road.
The Bentley Continental GT is an example of a larger, more expensive luxury car that defies its higher price tag by breaking down more frequently or costing more to fix.
Despite having the best yearly incident rate of the group, at 39%, the similarly iconic Porsche 911 (996) is among the 10 least reliable automobiles of the last 15 years due to its high average repair cost of $847.52.
The same can be said about luxury vehicle manufacturer Mercedes-Benz, whose vehicles appear three times in the list’s lowest ten spots.
For instance, the SL ranks towards the bottom of the list despite experiencing breakdowns less frequently than almost all of the other vehicles in the lowest-ranked group due to high repair costs.
The Audi RS6 tops the list of least dependable vehicles, which also includes the BMW M5, Mercedes-Benz SL, V-Class, and CL, Audi A6 Allroad, Bentley Continental GT, Porsche 911 (996), Land Rover Range Rover, and Citroen XM.
Duncan McClure Fisher, CEO of Warranty Direct, said: “We have amassed a colossally thorough database of cars over the course of our 15 years in business, including information on what works and what doesn’t.
“Reliability is usually one of the top priorities for consumers shopping for used cars, so the data our Reliability Index now contains is an essential tool for any buyer.
“Numerous new technologies have been added to cars over the years, making them more complex than ever. While many of these advances are directed toward crucial factors, like safety, they also increase the number of potential problems.
“The A6, which has start/stop technology, an electromechanical parking brake, a park assist system, and sensors for tyre pressure, light, and rain, to name just a few new innovations, has superseded the Audi 100, for instance, which was the first vehicle we ever covered.