Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and was initially propelled by a 14-cylinder, 1,020-horsepower Nakajima Sakae radial air-cooled engine with two staggered rows of seven cylinders. Later, it turned a three-blade constant-speed propeller using a 1,130 horsepower engine. It could carry two 132-pound (59.9-kg) bombs under the wings and reached a top speed of 350 mph (565 km/h) at a height of over 20,000 feet (6,100 m). It was armed with two 7.7-millimeter machine guns and two 20-millimeter cannons.
In This Article...
Are there any remaining Mitsubishi Zeros?
Less than 10 of the over 11,000 Zeroes manufactured during the war are still in operational condition. Here is footage of the historic flight obtained from the cockpit: This material was downloaded from YouTube.
The effectiveness of Mitsubishi Zeros
Before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the majority of American personnel had never seen a plane like the “Zero, which got its name from the manufacturer’s type designation rather than the famous Rising Sun emblem painted on the side: Mitsubishi 6M2 Type 0 Model 21. But those soldiers were aware of the Zero’s reputation. It had a 12:1 kill ratio in dogfights with the Chinese as early as 1940, making it a fighter plane with a reputation for being swift and strong and almost unstoppable. In a confrontation with skilled English pilots over Ceylon in April 1942, the Zero solidified its reputation (now Sri Lanka). 36 Zeroes engaged 60 British aircraft during that sortie, shooting down 27 of them while only losing one of its own. The Zero was so powerful that the official American tactic for pilots being attacked by the Japanese fighter was to flee.
Which aircraft performed the best during World War Two?
These were the top 10 World War II aircraft.
- One ultimate multi-role De Havilland Mosquito.
- Best Allied Fighter: North American P51 Mustang.
- The best heavy bomber is the Avro Lancaster.
- Best British Fighter: Supermarine Spitfire.
- 5 Best Long-Range Bomber: Boeing B29 Superfortress.
- FW-190 Focke-Wulf, Best Fighter.
The Zerodid Howard Hughes create it?
Is the myth/rumor that Howard Hughes created the Japanese Zero true? Some claim that after the US military rejected his H-1 effort, he sold it to the Japanese.
Jiro Horikoshi is clearly credited in a Google search.
Despite searching your website for information on the subject, I came up empty handed.
For your time and hard work in creating your website, I sincerely appreciate you in advance.
Long after they had been debunked, myths concerning the Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero fighter’s beginnings appear to resurface occasionally. Americans wanted to believe that the Zero was based on Howard Hughes’ H-1 racer due to a superficial resemblance, and aviation enthusiasts in Britain thought the same of the experimental Gloster F.5/37 designed by Henry Folland, which had debuted at the end of 1937 and finally retired in 1941 without a production contract. Another contender was the Seversky 2PA-B3 two-seat P-35 variant, 20 of which Japan acquired but rejected because they were deemed to be insufficiently nimble. However, Alexander Seversky’s reputation suffered so greatly as a result of selling the aircraft that the business he formed was renamed Republic Aviation.
All of these Zero myths were mostly based on American and European skepticism that the Japanese, who were viewed as inferior imitators, could have independently created such a cutting-edge and groundbreaking design. The A5M fighter, a sleek monoplane with fixed, faired-over landing gear that had had success over China from 1938 until the Zero’s release in 1940, served as the inspiration for Jiro Horikoshi and his design team, who did in fact do precisely that.
The January 2009 and July 2012 issues of Aviation History magazine contain feature pieces that discuss the technology, realities, and myths surrounding the Zero. In my recently released book, Fighter Aircraft Combat Debuts from Westholme Publishing LLC, Yardley, Pennsylvania, you may also gain a comprehensive understanding of how its development progressed (complete with the A5M and A6baptism M’s of fire) (2014).
Was the Zero a competent combat aircraft?
With its combination of great maneuverability and extremely long range, the Zero is regarded as having been the most capable carrier-based fighter in the world when it was first introduced in the early stages of World War II. It was extensively employed as a land-based fighter by the Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service (IJNAS).
A combination of new tactics and the advent of superior equipment allowed Allied pilots to engage the Zero on relatively equal terms by mid-1942, despite the Zero’s early reputation as a dogfighter and its amazing kill ratio of 12 to 1. Due to design restrictions, the Zero was less effective against more modern Allied fighters by 1943. Because it lacked hydraulic boosting for its ailerons and rudder, it was very challenging to control at high speeds. The A6M had largely lost its relevance as a fighter aircraft by 1944, with Allied fighters continuously outperforming it in terms of weaponry, armor, and speed, and nearing its levels of maneuverability. The Zero did, however, continue to fight in the front lines until the end of the Pacific War as design and production issues prevented the arrival of newer Japanese aircraft models. It was also modified for use in kamikaze operations in the closing stages. During the war, Japan built more Zeros than any other type of combat aircraft.
Which aircraft overcame the Japanese Zero?
How the F6F Hellcat came to represent the American response to the Japanese Zero. We are somewhat familiar with the Mitsubishi A6M Zero’s history. In the early stages of World War II in the Pacific Theater, it was a dominant fighter aircraft until succumbing to being a simple target.
Which guns on the Japanese Zero were what caliber?
In a competition to field the following carrier-born fighter, the Brewster F2A Buffalo triumphed over the initial F4F Wildcat, a biplane. Unhappy about losing a contract, Grumman presented two revised designs, and the F4F-3 was ultimately approved for use. It was also a good thing. The Brewster Buffalo proved out to be a total dud; whether at Midway or over Burma, Buffalos frequently fell to Zeros, costing Allied pilots their lives.
But the Zero proved to be a very strong opponent when the F4F faced it off. Two 7.7mm machine guns and two 20mm cannon made up an A Zero’s weaponry. The former was loaded with ammunition but had little stopping ability. The latter was stronger, but there wasn’t much ammunition available. As a result, several Japanese fighter pilots would fire their 7.7mm machine guns in battle only to discover the Wildcat was still in the air.
In contrast, the Wildcat’s battery of four to six M2.50-caliber machine guns provided both striking power and a plentiful supply of ammunition against the Zero’s weak armor. Stanley “Swede” Vejtasa used a Wildcat to kill seven Japanese aircraft in a single day.
Ammunition was just one benefit, though. Thanks to the discovery of the Akutan Zero, a recovered, crashed Zero that provided the US with knowledge into its internal workings, Wildcat pilots gained an advantage in terms of enemy intelligence (this vessel made a cameo in a training film featuring future President Ronald Reagan).