The 2021 Kia Seltos receives an average dependability rating from customers. There are 24 complaints about the Kia Seltos’ engines, 13 about early transmission failure, and one about inadequately heat-treated oil piston rings that might result in engine stall, fire, and damage.
In This Article...
Does the Kia Seltos Have Transmission Problems?
Numerous owners claim that the transmission in their Kia Seltos broke down at or below 6,500 miles. Transmission shake, loss of acceleration or power at 70 mph, engine shut-off, and the inability to reverse are among the NHTSA complaints. According to one owner, the timing chain on the CVT broke after 8,800 miles, causing metal shavings to appear in the engine oil.
Are Kia Seltos dependable vehicles?
Consumer Reports gave the 2022 Kia Seltos a dismal 1/5 expected dependability rating. According to Consumer Reports, “We anticipate the 2022 Seltos to be significantly less dependable than the typical new car. Data from the 2021 Kia Seltos, which similarly has a subpar reliability rating of 1/5, was used to calculate the Seltos’ rating. Both minor and significant transmission problems, which receive a 1/5, are among the worst difficulties with the 2021 Kia Seltos. The 2021 Kia Seltos’s body integrity, powertrain, and in-car electronics all get a 1/5 dependability rating.
To make matters worse, the 2022 Kia Seltos ranks dead last among other new cars, receiving an overall score of just 8. This grade, which includes a prognosis for when a vehicle is new, like the Seltos is, is derived from averaging the dependability rating for the three most recent years.
Kia Seltos is a compact SUV.
You should consider the 2023 Kia Seltos if you’re looking for a subcompact SUV. The Seltos has a huge amount of interior room for people and goods despite its diminutive exterior.
What caused Kia Seltos to fail?
According to pictures posted on social media, the SUV was split between the C pillar on the driver’s side and the B pillar on the passenger side. It is not often such an extent of destruction is evident.
It would be dangerous for rescue personnel to cut into the floor because the gasoline tank is right underneath the seat and the fuel lines also run below. According to reports, the Kia Seltos was moving quickly at the time of the collision on the two-lane NH-547.
Local police officials reportedly believe the Seltos was being driven very quickly. Additionally, it has been alleged that the driver is the subject of a FIR.
The split in the SUV was caused by a unique confluence of elements. The tremendous kinetic energy generated from the high-speed impact in a small space caused the Kia Seltos’ monocoque construction to entirely break into two pieces. The SUV appears to have been destroyed by a powerful force in the image.
The upgraded electronic stability control in the Kia Seltos’ most recent iteration helps the car maintain stability even during maneuvers at high speeds. The SUV that was involved in the collision is an earlier model of the Anniversary Edition, which is no longer available. It lacked the ESC feature.
According to reports, a motorcycle rider suddenly crossed in front of the SUV as it transitioned from a gravel lane to the main road.
In an effort to save the motorcycle rider, the SUV’s driver swerved and made a U-turn. The SUV then returned to the road and abruptly made a right turn in anticipation of a bridge. However, the maneuvers were unsuccessful, and the Seltos struck the bridge. The impact caused the SUV’s floor and roof torn off, causing the SUV to split in half.
The SUV’s rear seat occupants perished in the collision. Despite suffering severe injuries, those in the first row were able to survive thanks to the airbags and seatbelts.
Prior to this, the Kia Seltos received a 5-star rating in both the ANCAP and Global NCAP crash tests. Six airbags and safety aid systems were included as standard equipment in the ANCAP test vehicle. Dual front airbags, ABS with EBD, and rear parking sensors are all standard on the vehicle built for India. Up to six airbags, blind-spot monitoring, a head-up display, and a 360-degree camera are included in the model.
Why did sales of Kia Seltos decline?
In addition to the premium MPV Carnival, Kia India also sells the Seltos and Sonet SUVs. Next week, the company will introduce Carens, a three-row SUV, as its fourth vehicle in India.
By:
revised on:
The continuous supply crisis is to blame for the 13% decline in sales recorded by Korean automaker Kia last month. Kia’s sales have plummeted by more than 32% compared to the same month last year, with only 14,214 cars sold in November.
Kia recorded sales of 16,331 units in October of this year, a decrease of almost 22% from the same month last year. The sales decline has gotten worse inside a month.
What drawbacks exist with Kia vehicles?
Everyone can find a Kia, but the drawback of buying a Borrego, Forte, Optima, Sorento, Spectra, Sportage, or any other model you can afford is that you will almost certainly have transmission issues. Owners of Sorentos are likely to have noticed jerking when changing, especially when moving uphill at a speed of roughly 75 mph.
Kia’s transmission issues, however, go beyond jerking. A 2019 Kia Forte owner from Delaware claims that, despite having less than 5,000 miles on the odometer, the transmission has already been changed twice. Similar depressing transmission-related experiences are common among Forte owners.
Do Kia Seltos have issues with the transmission?
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration receives consumer complaints about sudden transmission failure. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has 62 complaints and one recall related to the 2021 Kia Seltos, just 13 of which are related to powertrain problems.
How much should I spend on a Kia Seltos?
The starting price of a Kia Seltos LX with AWD is $22,840, while the price of the S with FWD is $22,890. The 2023 Kia Seltos starts at $24,390 for the S AWD variant. $1,295 is the destination fee. The starting price of a Kia Seltos Nightfall Edition AWD is $27,040, whereas the starting price of an EX AWD is $26,140.
What vehicle’s size is equivalent to the Kia Seltos?
The interiors of each vehicle are a fascinating additional comparison point between the Seltos and Sportage. Both vehicles boast cozy interiors and a plethora of premium amenities. The 2023 Kia Sportage has an eight-inch touch screen, Android AutoTM, and Apple CarPlay, as well as a stylish design that seamlessly integrates the elegant controls of the center console into the overall appearance of the vehicle. The 2023 Kia Sportage also boasts a touch screen display, phone connectivity, and a range of optional options, such as a wireless phone charging pad and three USB ports.
# of Seats:
Carrying capacity
Length:
Width:
These two brand-new Kia SUVs are both available for purchase and provide spacious seating for five people as well as identical load capabilities. The Kia Seltos and Sportage are similar in length and width overall, but the Sportage is noticeably larger. For those who like a taller ride or like to stray from the paved path, the Seltos, on the other hand, offers a somewhat higher ground clearance.
Which Kia Seltos model is the best to purchase?
The Kia Seltos lineup is a maze of variations, but if you break it down according to your needs, you’ll get the appropriate model for the right price. If money is not an issue, the 1.4 petrol-auto GTX+ is our choice. The many feel-good features simply enhance the experience because of the amazing combination of performance and convenience. The Seltos diesel is an excellent choice if you think of SUVs as having diesel engines or if you simply drive a lot of miles. Lower versions are reasonably priced for what you get, but if you want more frills and an automobile, be ready to fork over a sizeable sum of money.
All things considered, for typical urban consumers, the Kia Seltos 1.5 petrol with the CVT automatic will make the most sense. The petrol engine and CVT work well together and make daily driving less stressful. There is only one available variation, but it comes with tons of extras and is reasonably priced. The Seltos 1.5 petrol-auto becomes an attractive purchase when you factor in the promise of respectable fuel efficiency (claimed 16.8kpl).
Are KIAS still valuable?
We’ll venture the bold assumption that you’ll want to sell your car for as much money as you can. You want to recover as much of the cost of the investment as you can because it was expensive. All cars lose value over time, but some do it more quickly than others.
IntelliChoice calculated the average retained values for a brand’s full model portfolio over a five-year period to find out. These estimates allow us to identify which manufacturers’ vehicles have better depreciation resistance. Let’s talk about the automobile brands that lose value more quickly now that we’ve determined which ones do so the best.
Mini: 50.4 Percent Retained Value
A fairly, well, small percentage of drivers are drawn to Mini automobiles because of its size, which lives up to its name. Models with charming aesthetics and nimble handling, like the retro Cooper, sporty Countryman crossover, or funky Clubman wagon, attract drivers with an eye for fashion and a sense of adventure but, more crucially, who can manage their diminutive dimensions. However, doubts about future worth may put buyers’ first enchantment to rest. The Countryman and Clubman receive a Poor five-year cost of ownership rating from IntelliChoice. Furthermore, we weren’t too impressed by the brand’s recent attempts at electrification. As joyful as Mini’s cars are to look at and drive, the brand’s market position is indicated by its value retention rate of 50.4%.
Mazda: 49.3 Percent Retained Value
Mazda doesn’t compare to other Japanese brands in terms of name recognition, lineup diversity, or value despite producing some of the best-looking and best-driving mainstream cars on the market. Even though the Mazda3 and Miata have sizable fan groups, those and other models may place a greater emphasis on driving characteristics than general utility. The Mazda6 lagged behind rival sedans until it was recently discontinued, while the CX-30 and CX-9 are less adaptable than rival crossovers. Although we usually love driving a Mazda, its value retention rate of 49.3 percent isn’t as high as that of its primary rivals. Possibly the brand’s next, higher-end vehicles will hold their value longer.
Kia: 47.7 Percent Retained Value
Kia has put a lot of effort into keeping up with its rivals in terms of quality, dynamics, and design. Want proof? The Sorento is back and even better than before, the Telluride won our competition for SUV of the Year, and the Optima’s makeover into the K5 gave this sedan new life. However, despite their appeal in other areas, Kia’s automobiles behind with an average value retention rate of 47.7% during a five-year period. Despite its extensive standard warranty and genuinely enticing options, that is the case. Even while we enjoy driving the Telluride and the sporty Stinger, Kia still needs to improve as evidenced by their respective Mediocre and Poor IntelliChoice scores.
Hyundai: 47.1 Percent Retained Value
Hyundai strives to match the reputation for quality and durability of Toyota and Honda, much like its corporate rival Kia. The long-term value proposition of Hyundai doesn’t appear to have been significantly impacted by a lengthy warranty or a group of very regarded experts. Models like the Sonata, Palisade, and Tucson serve as indicators of how far the brand’s products have come. However, Hyundai’s 47.1 retained value % suggests that it needs to do more to earn the trust of customers who value their money.
Volkswagen: 46.9 Percent Retained Value
Volkswagen’s image for quality suffered as a result of the Dieselgate incident, even though the company didn’t have a very strong one to begin with. Volkswagen lacks American and Asian rivals in mass-market appeal, even with more recent models like the Tiguan or Atlas, which only manage Average or Mediocre IntelliChoice value scores depending on trim. A shorter warranty is detrimental to its cause. Volkswagen is planning a number of electric vehicles, which might assist the company’s current 46.9% value retention percentage.
Nissan: 45.6 Percent Retained Value
Nissan has struggled to gain momentum and maintain its competitive position after a high-level organizational restructuring. It is currently working on refreshing its stale lineup. We were impressed by some of those efforts, like the Rogue and Sentra. Others, such as the legendary Z sports vehicle or the Pathfinder, stop at simply spiffing up antiquated platforms and engines. Despite the merits of Nissan’s engineering advancements, only a small percentage of its vehicles receive Good IntelliChoice value scores; the majority are ranked at Average, Mediocre, or Poor in terms of ownership costs. Nissan has a dismal 45.6 percent average value retention over a five-year period.
Buick: 42.3 Percent Retained Value
What does Buick mean today? Buick doesn’t seem to be confident in itself. Due to the brand’s current inventory consisting solely of SUVs, its tradition of opulent vintage sedans has come to an end. All of those models aren’t particularly terrible, but they don’t do much to change the outdated perception of Buick. Additionally, Buick’s uncertain positioning does not help. Does it aim for real luxury to compete with the best in the field, or does it aim for a premium experience at entry-level pricing? We believe Buick requires revival and a more focused course. If and when it occurs, it might improve the lineup’s average value retention, which is 42.3 percent.
Mitsubishi: 41.3 Percent Retained Value
Many of the Mitsubishi vehicles we’ve evaluated are affordable, but not just financially. We’ve encountered subpar engineering and craftsmanship in Mitsubishi cars, which leads to dull driving experiences. The Mirage and Eclipse Cross are among the least expensive options in their respective sectors, which is obvious from their flimsy construction and crude driving characteristics. The previous Outlander’s available electric driving range deserves praise, but the revised three-row SUV falls short of expectations. Mitsubishi’s value retention rate of 41.3% is significantly lower than that of other brands. Every other Mitsubishi has a Mediocre or Poor IntelliChoice ownership rating, leaving just the outdated Outlander Hybrid.
Chrysler: 40.2 Percent Retained Value
Any carmaker would find it challenging to maintain a two-model lineup, especially if those options are designed to compete in some of the least-wanted segments of the market. But Chrysler is going in that direction. Despite having advantages of its own, the 300 sedan and Pacifica minivan just do not appeal to the tastes of contemporary drivers. Only a layer of gradual improvements can hide the 300’s deterioration. Considering that it is a minivan, the Pacifica (and its fleet-only Voyager counterpart) is actually rather decent. Although Chrysler’s future is uncertain, introducing models that are contemporary in design could increase the lineup’s average value retention rate of 40.2%.
Fiat: 39.5 Percent Retained Value
Fiat’s tiny, quirky cars briefly appeared ready to inject some Italian panache into the compact car market. But that period has passed, and it is now clear that Fiats are less attractive than they once were. The 500X subcompact crossover is the only vehicle currently offered by the brand. Its cute design and standard AWD can’t make up for its sloppy driving manners and shoddy construction. Fiat’s abysmal 39.5 percent retention rate is the weakest among major brands because the 500X symbolizes the complete lineup.