Earlier this year, the 2019 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, a new crossover, was unveiled. The Eclipse Cross stands out from other small crossovers because to its stylish, coupe-like styling. With 22.6 cubic feet of storage space in the back or up to 48.9 cubic feet with the rear seats folding, this design does have certain limitations on freight capacity. All Eclipse Cross models come with reclining second-row seats, which improves the comfort of the back seat for adults.
The biggest benefit of the Eclipse Cross is that it is enjoyable to drive, thanks to its spirited 1.5-liter turbocharged engine, which produces 152 horsepower when paired with a continuously variable transmission. Starting at $25,320, the 2019 Eclipse Cross is likewise reasonably priced.
In This Article...
The Kia Sportage is comparable to what?
Even though the Sportage is back for the 2019 model year with a number of alluring features, it still needs to set itself apart in a crowded field of highly regarded competitors like the Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4, Nissan Rogue, Volkswagen Tiguan, Subaru Forester, and Ford Escape.
What automaker is comparable to Kia?
Hyundai and Kia share numerous similarities. Both companies are situated in South Korea and have comparable product lines. In actuality, just 34% of Kia Motors is owned by Hyundai Motor Co. Many of these vehicles share engineering, platforms, and powertrains. Hyundai and Kia, however, run their businesses separately. Each brand continues to operate its own design studios, engineering team, sales team, and marketing division. Having said that, there are really more positive similarities between the two brands than negative ones, which is good. Both manufacturers produce luxurious cars with excellent warranties that their owners adore. Nevertheless, it’s important to be aware of these minor variations so that you can make an educated decision.
Is Toyota superior to Kia?
According to a J.D. Power research from 2019, Kia has the highest initial quality in the non-premium segment in the United States. The 2016 Kia Soul, 2016 Toyota Corolla, Prius, and Prius V were all rated as being among the most dependable vehicles on the road by J.D. Power.
which is more trustworthy Nissan or Kia?
In terms of quality, Kia clearly outperforms Nissan. Kia came in third place, only behind Lexus and Porsche, in the 2021 J.D. Power U.S. Vehicle Dependability study. Kia is in fairly excellent company, in our opinion. Nissan, on the other hand, came in below the sector average of 121 issues per 100 brand-new cars, with an average of 128. In contrast, Kia claims to have just 97 issues for every 100 vehicles. That places Kia ahead of luxury manufacturers like Audi, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz as well as Nissan. The Kia Sportage was named the best small SUV in the survey, and the Kia Sorento was named the best midsize SUV. In fact, Kia came out on top in two distinct sectors.
Is the Sportage or Tucson better?
The identical 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine is standard on both the Tucson and Sportage, although the Tucson gets slightly better fuel economy ratings than the Sportage. The Sportage can only go up to 28 mpg combined, compared to the Tucson’s maximum combined rating of 29 mpg.
Who is Kia’s primary rival?
Hyundai Capital and Toyota are rivals of Kia America. Comparably rates Kia America as having the highest overall culture score among its rivals.
Do Hyundai and Kia share the same engines?
Yes, a lot of the engines used in Hyundai models are also used in Kia cars, and the reverse is also true. Several instances include:
- The Hyundai Kona, Hyundai i20, Kia Ceed, and Kia Stonic all have Kappa G3LA/G3LC engines.
- The Hyundai i30, Kia Ceed, and Hyundai Elantra all feature the Kappa G4LD engine.
- The Kia Rio, Kia Ceed, and Hyundai i20 all have Gamma G4FA engines.
- The Kia Ceed, Kia Rio, and Hyundai Accent all employ the Gamma MPI/GDI/T-GDI.
- The Kia Sorento, Hyundai Sonata, and Kia Stinger all use Theta MFI/GDI Turbo engines.
- The Hyundai Santa Fe and Kia Sorento both use the D4HB engine.
- The Hyundai Santa Fe and Kia Stinger both use the Lambda MPI/DGI/T-GDI.
Toyota or Kia: which SUV is superior?
Conclusion: The Highlander is the right pick if your primary consideration is fuel efficiency. In our testing for fuel efficiency, the V6 performs admirably, and the Hybrid’s mileage is exceptional for some vehicles, let alone a three-row SUV.
Because they will feel at home as soon as they slide into the cabin, devoted Toyota customers may choose to stick with the brand as well. The Highlander is an unremarkable, but family-friendly, SUV. Keep in mind that historically, the Highlander has a very high value.
However, the Telluride is superior in many areas, even outperforming the Highlander in the first year’s reliability and owner satisfaction surveys. The Kia performs admirably while the Toyota does nicely. A winning SUV is one that also has a smoother transmission, better braking, a nicer interior, more interior and cargo space, and additional standard active safety features like BSW and RCTW.
Customers thinking about the Kia might also want to examine the Hyundai Palisade, which shares the Telluride’s basis (frame, suspension, engine, and transmission).
My profession is a direct result of my father purchasing a 1965 Corvette and me choosing an Audi A4 over a Chevy Tahoe. My passion for automobiles was sparked by the Corvette, and the Audi introduced me to automotive journalism, track days, and do-it-yourself vehicle repair. No matter the season, I cycle as much as I can in my spare time.
Toyota or the RAV4 are superior to the Kia Sportage.
Excellent fuel efficiency: The Toyota RAV4 outperforms the Kia Sportage in this category. Front-wheel drive (FWD) and all-wheel drive (AWD) models of the RAV4 can achieve up to 30 combined mpg. In contrast, the Sportage only achieves 25 mpg with AWD and only up to 28 combined mpg with FWD.
What Kia model is equivalent to the Toyota RAV4?
There are two different brands of small two-row SUVs: the Kia Sportage and the Toyota RAV4. Both of these cars have five seats. All-wheel drive is an option for each of them, with front-wheel drive being the default.
The Kia Sportage and Toyota RAV4’s base engines are quite similar. While the RAV4 has 176 horsepower, the Sportage has 181. They provide a variety of optional engines. While the RAV4 features a gasoline-electric hybrid powertrain with an available total system horsepower of 194, the Kia Sportage provides a 240-horsepower alternative.
When comparing the Sportage and the RAV4, the cargo space is much different. When the rear seats are folded, the Sportage offers 60.1 cubic feet of room behind the front row whereas the RAV4 has 73.4 cubic feet. Here, the RAV4 is in the lead.
Both the Toyota RAV4 and the Kia Sportage provide a satisfying overall compact SUV driving experience. You can get a lot more optional power and the Kia 10-year/100,000-mile powertrain guarantee with the Sportage. You have a lot more cargo room and a hybrid alternative with the RAV4. Look at both and decide which one suits you better.
Are Kias as durable as Toyotas?
Maintaining the factory-recommended maintenance plan and taking care of problems as soon as they appear are the best ways to maintain your Kia in good working order. Any material or workmanship flaws should be covered by the Kia guarantee that comes with new and certified pre-owned cars, but these protections ultimately run out.
If your car needs repairs after the first warranty period has passed, an extended warranty might assist cover the cost of such unforeseen expenses. Kia has an extended warranty that may be purchased directly from the company, but you can also acquire coverage from third parties.
Independent extended warranty providers frequently provide more options for coverage, older vehicle coverage, a larger network of repair facilities, and more comprehensive benefits. Endurance and CarShield are two companies that we suggest.
Endurance: Best Coverage
Up to 8 years or 200,000+ miles of additional warranty coverage are possible with Endurance. Additionally, Endurance offers some of the market’s most comprehensive contracts. There are five different coverage options available, ranging from straightforward powertrain coverage to complete bumper-to-bumper warranty protection.
CarShield: Best Value
Additionally, CarShield provides extended warranty protection for cars with up to 300,000 miles on the odometer, potentially doubling the Kia factory warranty’s scope of coverage. CarShield offers a solid reputation in the market, a wide range of coverage options, and some of the most affordable contracts available.
For more information, see our comprehensive CarShield review. To get a free, no-risk CarShield quote, click the button below.
Frequently Asked Questions
Kia is a dependable automaker. Overall, Kia receives a reliability rating of 4.0 out of 5.0 on RepairPal, placing it third overall (out of 32 brands).
Both Kia and Toyota are well-known for their dependability, and both have a 4.0 out of 5.0 RepairPal reliability rating. Kias may be marginally more reliable, while RepairPal puts Toyota seventh overall and Kia third.
Kias require an average of 0.2 unforeseen repair shop visits year, according to RepairPal. This is half of the 0.4 visits per year average for all brands. You have a one in five risk of needing an unforeseen repair each year, according to this statistic.
Previously, the Kia name was associated with low-cost, subpar vehicles. This is partly because the brand’s automobiles had a lot of issues when it first appeared in the United States. Since then, Kia has made fleet improvements and has earned a reputation for having great reliability.
Yes, Kias have a reputation for lasting just as long as other trustworthy cars like Hyundai, Honda, and Toyota. Although the powertrain is covered by the manufacturer’s warranty for up to 100,000 miles, many owners keep their Kias for much longer.
Do Kia automobiles retain their value?
We’ll venture the bold assumption that you’ll want to sell your car for as much money as you can. You want to recover as much of the cost of the investment as you can because it was expensive. All cars lose value over time, but some do it more quickly than others.
IntelliChoice calculated the average retained values for a brand’s full model portfolio over a five-year period to find out. These estimates allow us to identify which manufacturers’ vehicles have better depreciation resistance. Let’s talk about the automobile brands that lose value more quickly now that we’ve determined which ones do so the best.
Mini: 50.4 Percent Retained Value
A fairly, well, small percentage of drivers are drawn to Mini automobiles because of its size, which lives up to its name. Models with charming aesthetics and nimble handling, like the retro Cooper, sporty Countryman crossover, or funky Clubman wagon, attract drivers with an eye for fashion and a sense of adventure but, more crucially, who can manage their diminutive dimensions. However, doubts about future worth may put buyers’ first enchantment to rest. The Countryman and Clubman receive a Poor five-year cost of ownership rating from IntelliChoice. Furthermore, we weren’t too impressed by the brand’s recent attempts at electrification. As joyful as Mini’s cars are to look at and drive, the brand’s market position is indicated by its value retention rate of 50.4%.
Mazda: 49.3 Percent Retained Value
Mazda doesn’t compare to other Japanese brands in terms of name recognition, lineup diversity, or value despite producing some of the best-looking and best-driving mainstream cars on the market. Even though the Mazda3 and Miata have sizable fan groups, those and other models may place a greater emphasis on driving characteristics than general utility. The Mazda6 lagged behind rival sedans until it was recently discontinued, while the CX-30 and CX-9 are less adaptable than rival crossovers. Although we usually love driving a Mazda, its value retention rate of 49.3 percent isn’t as high as that of its primary rivals. Possibly the brand’s next, higher-end vehicles will hold their value longer.
Kia: 47.7 Percent Retained Value
Kia has put a lot of effort into keeping up with its rivals in terms of quality, dynamics, and design. Want proof? The Sorento is back and even better than before, the Telluride won our competition for SUV of the Year, and the Optima’s makeover into the K5 gave this sedan new life. However, despite their appeal in other areas, Kia’s automobiles behind with an average value retention rate of 47.7% during a five-year period. Despite its extensive standard warranty and genuinely enticing options, that is the case. Even while we enjoy driving the Telluride and the sporty Stinger, Kia still needs to improve as evidenced by their respective Mediocre and Poor IntelliChoice scores.
Hyundai: 47.1 Percent Retained Value
Hyundai strives to match the reputation for quality and durability of Toyota and Honda, much like its corporate rival Kia. The long-term value proposition of Hyundai doesn’t appear to have been significantly impacted by a lengthy warranty or a group of very regarded experts. Models like the Sonata, Palisade, and Tucson serve as indicators of how far the brand’s products have come. However, Hyundai’s 47.1 retained value % suggests that it needs to do more to earn the trust of customers who value their money.
Volkswagen: 46.9 Percent Retained Value
Volkswagen’s image for quality suffered as a result of the Dieselgate incident, even though the company didn’t have a very strong one to begin with. Volkswagen lacks American and Asian rivals in mass-market appeal, even with more recent models like the Tiguan or Atlas, which only manage Average or Mediocre IntelliChoice value scores depending on trim. A shorter warranty is detrimental to its cause. Volkswagen is planning a number of electric vehicles, which might assist the company’s current 46.9% value retention percentage.
Nissan: 45.6 Percent Retained Value
Nissan has struggled to gain momentum and maintain its competitive position after a high-level organizational restructuring. It is currently working on refreshing its stale lineup. We were impressed by some of those efforts, like the Rogue and Sentra. Others, such as the legendary Z sports vehicle or the Pathfinder, stop at simply spiffing up antiquated platforms and engines. Despite the merits of Nissan’s engineering advancements, only a small percentage of its vehicles receive Good IntelliChoice value scores; the majority are ranked at Average, Mediocre, or Poor in terms of ownership costs. Nissan has a dismal 45.6 percent average value retention over a five-year period.
Buick: 42.3 Percent Retained Value
What does Buick mean today? Buick doesn’t seem to be confident in itself. Due to the brand’s current inventory consisting solely of SUVs, its tradition of opulent vintage sedans has come to an end. All of those models aren’t particularly terrible, but they don’t do much to change the outdated perception of Buick. Additionally, Buick’s uncertain positioning does not help. Does it aim for real luxury to compete with the best in the field, or does it aim for a premium experience at entry-level pricing? We believe Buick requires revival and a more focused course. If and when it occurs, it might improve the lineup’s average value retention, which is 42.3 percent.
Mitsubishi: 41.3 Percent Retained Value
Many of the Mitsubishi vehicles we’ve evaluated are affordable, but not just financially. We’ve encountered subpar engineering and craftsmanship in Mitsubishi cars, which leads to dull driving experiences. The Mirage and Eclipse Cross are among the least expensive options in their respective sectors, which is obvious from their flimsy construction and crude driving characteristics. The previous Outlander’s available electric driving range deserves praise, but the revised three-row SUV falls short of expectations. Mitsubishi’s value retention rate of 41.3% is significantly lower than that of other brands. Every other Mitsubishi has a Mediocre or Poor IntelliChoice ownership rating, leaving just the outdated Outlander Hybrid.
Chrysler: 40.2 Percent Retained Value
Any carmaker would find it challenging to maintain a two-model lineup, especially if those options are designed to compete in some of the least-wanted segments of the market. But Chrysler is going in that direction. Despite having advantages of its own, the 300 sedan and Pacifica minivan just do not appeal to the tastes of contemporary drivers. Only a layer of gradual improvements can hide the 300’s deterioration. Considering that it is a minivan, the Pacifica (and its fleet-only Voyager counterpart) is actually rather decent. Although Chrysler’s future is uncertain, introducing models that are contemporary in design could increase the lineup’s average value retention rate of 40.2%.
Fiat: 39.5 Percent Retained Value
Fiat’s tiny, quirky cars briefly appeared ready to inject some Italian panache into the compact car market. But that period has passed, and it is now clear that Fiats are less attractive than they once were. The 500X subcompact crossover is the only vehicle currently offered by the brand. Its cute design and standard AWD can’t make up for its sloppy driving manners and shoddy construction. Fiat’s abysmal 39.5 percent retention rate is the weakest among major brands because the 500X symbolizes the complete lineup.