Is Audi Q4 Bigger Than Q3

Audi may not have the luxury small SUV market largely to itself anymore, but with the Q3 and Q4, it is still one of the top competitors. There is lots of choice while preserving the four rings on the snout because both are offered as traditional “SUV estates” or slightly less practical Sportback variants. Since the EV is more expensive to lease but less expensive to run, the choice between gasoline and electricity is not as clear-cut.

With the original Q3, Audi was one of the first automakers to provide a stylish compact SUV, but the market has changed significantly since then. Competitors include the Volvo XC40, Mercedes GLA, Range Rover Evoque, and the BMW X1 and X2 models. Additionally, the all-electric Q4 E-Tron and the Sportback versions of the Q3 and Q4 with their steeper sloping tailgates are competitors within its own ranks.

The Q3 is available with the typical gasoline and diesel engines in addition to a gasoline-electric hybrid option for the drivetrain. Audi has converted to its E-Tron all-electric motor for the Q4, and like the most of the vehicles in its lineup, buyers must choose between 2- and 4-wheel drive. But that’s a choice that just affects drivetrains. The more powerful Q4s stick with 2-wheel drive, while the top-of-the-line Q4 50 has a quattro 4WD. Even so, things are a little different because these are rear-drive instead of front-wheel drive, which is Audi’s customary preference. This is so because the Q4 shares a platform with the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.4.

Leasing costs for the Q3 and Q4 are comparable, however when comparing vehicles of the same trim and quality, the Q3 fueled by fossil fuels is significantly less expensive. Will that affect your choice? We shall see.

Design Differences

The Q3 and Q4 share a lot of the same design cues because they both come from the same styling department. However, it’s obvious that the Q3 is more conventional in appearance, as Audi was unwilling to lose a loyal client base that had been amassed over the course of more than a decade. The Q4 comes from a bolder pen, on the other hand. With a massive (even by Audi standards) grille that appears to be pressing the headlights out of the frame, it has a more aggressive appearance. All of the cooling air for the batteries is brought in through the vents below, thus this grille serves just as decoration.

The Q4 is once more more style-driven at the rear and down the sides, which is not necessarily a good thing because the Q3 has much simpler lines that feel far less “look at me.” The Q3 uses a more subdued approach to integrating the Volkswagen Group twin-screen dash into its interior, which is also true outside. With the elevated center console and angular steering wheel that feels curiously bumpy as it passes through your hands when you maneuver, Audi has pushed the dial up to 10.5 for the Q4. The inside of the Q4 is annoyingly sensible in most aspects and irritatingly stupid in others. We simply wish Audi had turned up the design dial all the way.

We can clearly notice the technical changes between Q3 and Q4 when we put on our X-ray glasses. Depending on the model you choose, the Q3’s engine is positioned in the usual transverse configuration to drive either the front wheels or all four. We chose the all-wheel drive quattro model with the 190hp 2.0-liter turbocharged gasoline engine and 7-speed automatic transmission for our comparison.

With the R8 supercar serving as its sole actual antecedent, the Q4 is the first rear-wheel-drive Audi model to be built in significant quantities. Due to the usage of the same platform as the Skoda Enyaq and VW ID.4 for cost savings, Audi has been obliged to make this significant change despite its longstanding aversion to rear-drive. All-wheel drive is an option for the Q4, but you’ll need to spend more money on the 50 model because it’s not available for the 35 or 40 models, which are both less potent.

Driving Differences

Here, we’ll start with the Q4. This EV is among the best of its kind for controlling the tug-of-war between the body and the wheels over bumps on a normal British A-road. It rivals the Skoda Enyaq’s level of comfort and outperforms the Jaguar I-Pace by a significant margin. The adjustable suspension, which enables you to customize its responses to the road ahead, is a must-have addition if you want the highest level of comfort in the Q4. The Q4 is significantly more polished than a Ford Mustang Mach-E in how it deflects noise away from the cabin, even with the stock setup, which is still quite impressive. The Q4’s 2-wheel-drive models have a surprisingly small turning circle, and they handle in a typically Audi manner with reassuring amounts of grip without ever seeming to engage much with the driver.

Depending on the model you select, the Q4’s acceleration ranges from passable to “cor blimey.” The 50 is hot-hatch quick, while the 35 is sufficient for the majority of purposes. With the 40, we’d choose a vehicle in the middle that has sufficient oomph for all circumstances without rapidly depleting its battery.

Here is the Q3. The petrol-powered Q3 in this comparison did not lag behind the refinement of its Q4 sibling by a significant margin despite having an internal combustion engine and all the fiery explosions that comes with it. At all speeds, the engine has a little bit more growl, although at higher speeds, road noise is effectively muffled and wind rustling is not a problem.

In order to provide a fair comparison, the 2.0-liter 4-cylinder turbo engine with 190 horsepower was chosen instead of our recommended 1.5-liter 3-cylinder petrol engine for the Q3. It moves at a quick pace comparable to the Q4 50, and its 7-speed twin-clutch automatic transmission is so seamless that you don’t notice when it shifts gears.

Which model you choose will determine how well the Q3 handles rough roads. The adaptive suspension found on the Q4 is available if you choose the top-tier Vorsprung, and the same is true for the Q3. You can obtain the stiffer suspension that Audi plainly deems as sch-porty if you choose the S line or Edition 1 models. However, we have to say “Nein Danke” because it’s frequently too jiggly and unsteady, which has a negative impact on refining. The Sport model we have here has a basic suspension that is much superior. It performs admirably for this class of vehicle, striking a similar balance between comfort and body control to that of a Volvo XC40 or Hyundai Tucson.

Practicality Differences

The change between the Q3 and Q4 is most noticeable from the driver’s seat more so than everywhere else. In the Q3, you sit slightly higher than any hatchbacks around you, but in the Q4, you sit upright and have a better view of most other vehicles. Although you won’t be looking directly at van drivers, the Q4 gives off a greater sense of SUV freedom of view and has better all-around vision for parking.

The digital dash from Audi is programmable in the Q3 and Q4. Is it useful? Perhaps, however unless using the satnav, we’ve discovered that we choose a screen we like and keep with it. Both vehicles have a 10.1-inch screen with a crisp and logical infotainment display. Oddly, despite the fact that they are all from the same general automaker, Audi’s approach to this is simpler and better to use than those found in the Volkswagen ID.4 or Skoda Enyaq. In order to make regulating the temperature while driving easier, we also appreciate that Audi equips each of its vehicles with physical buttons for the heating settings.

When you climb into the back seats, the larger Q4 is ideal for taller passengers and gives adults greater space in all directions. Your children will be more than content in the Q3, but your friends will only want to stay for a maximum of an hour. They’ll be content in the Q4 all day if you put the same friends in the rear.

The Q4 has a somewhat smaller trunk than the Q3, which is a compromise made because of the rear-mounted electric powertrain that takes up some space. The Q3 has 530 liters of room with the seats up and 1525 liters with the back pews folded down, so you can pack it to the brim. In the same configurations, the Q4 can hold 520 and 1490 liters, respectively.

Running Cost Comparison

The Q4 E-Tron is in a lower insurance classification than the petrol Q3 in a break from the norm. Choose the EV, whose premium is based on a group 29 rating, as opposed to our preferred Q3, which is in group 30. With its Vehicle Excise Duty of 555 as opposed to $0 for the Q4, the Q3 continues to be financially burdensome. Additionally, the Q3 will cost a low-rate tax paying company driver 2666 per year whereas the Q4 is only 84 over the same time period.

The Q4 E-Tron 40, according to Audi, can drive 317 miles on a single charge. The Q3 40 TFSI quattro can travel up to 490 miles on a full tank before running out of gas. The gasoline vehicle requires a service visit every 9000 miles or 12 months, whereas the electric vehicle may travel twice as far and for twice as long before requiring a dealer visit. The Q4 has an additional 8-year, 100,000-mile battery warranty, and both vehicles are covered by Audi’s 3-year, 60,000-mile warranty.

Living With the Electric Car

The 40 model we choose here, in contrast to the entry-level Q4 E-Tron 35, can use chargers of up to 125kW, allowing you to recharge the battery from 10 to 100 percent charge in as little as 35 minutes. In addition to a cable to connect the car to a domestic 3-pin socket in case of an emergency, Audi also includes a Mode 3 cable for use with Type 2 public chargers, albeit doing so will take a lot of time.

With the Q4, you can use the MyAudi app to perform all of the standard smartphone tasks, like checking the battery charge, charging progress, and remaining range remotely. Additionally, it allows you to find the vehicle in crowded parking lots, download locations to the satnav, and even monitor the level of the screen washer fluid. The ability of the app to locate nearby charging stations and pre-warm the cabin to your preferred temperature while connected to a charger to extend driving range may be more practical on a daily basis.

In our most recent review, Matt Robinson, our resident automotive expert, tests out the Audi A5 Coupe, Sportback, and Coupe.

View Review

In his most recent review, Matt Robinson, our resident automotive expert, examines the Audi SQ7.

View Review

Cookies from this website are saved on your device. We will be able to remember you and your preferences thanks to these cookies. We make use of this data to make your surfing experience better. Please see our cookie policy for more details.

The distinction between a Q3 and a Q4 is what.

Dividend payments and financial reporting are generally done quarterly. Not all businesses will have calendar-based fiscal quarters, and it is typical for businesses to terminate their fourth quarter following their busiest season. Although many businesses outside the United States may not pay dividends equally, payments are frequently paid on a quarterly basis.

Fiscal quarter and fiscal year are the two primary accounting periods used by businesses (FY). Most businesses operate on a fiscal year that extends from January 1 to December 31 (although this is not required). The following are the four conventional calendar quarters that make up the year:

  • February, March, and January (Q1)
  • May, June, and April (Q2)
  • August, September, and July (Q3)
  • November, December, and October (Q4)

Some businesses have fiscal years that adhere to various dates. The fiscal year of Costco Wholesale Corporation runs from September 1 to August 31. As a result, June, July, and August are included in its fiscal fourth quarter.

A company’s fiscal quarters (fiscal quarters) and fourth fiscal quarter (fourth fiscal quarter) end on the same day as the company’s fiscal year (fiscal year).

By how much more does the Q4 compare to the Q3?

The Q4 e-tron is a small electric SUV that is built on the same platform as the ID.4, which is now available for purchase in the United States. However, it will have a more upscale interior in addition to the dual motors that are expected. The Q4’s exact specifications have not yet been made public; they will do so next month; nevertheless, we can anticipate that, in keeping with the Q4’s key brand positioning, it will feature an 82-kW battery and all-wheel drive. If the specifications match those of the ID.4, we can anticipate a combined output of 302 horsepower (225 kW). It should also have a range of 250 miles, though the added weight of some of the luxury items inside may reduce this number slightly.

The Q4 e-tron is about four inches longer than the gasoline-powered Q3 and four inches shorter than the Q5, respectively, with a length of 180.7 inches. The Q4 will also be 63.5 inches tall, which is nearly equal to the 62.9-inch height of the Q3 and makes it simple for customers to compare it to other gas-powered vehicles at the same dealership.

Audi has published some interior images of the Q4 earlier this month, but the SUV’s whole exterior, free of camouflage, has yet to be seen.

The Q4 will go on sale in the United States at the end of this year, and the Q4 Sportback will follow the following year. Audi’s new baby EV will compete with vehicles like the Volvo XC40 Recharge and the Tesla Model Y, although it is likely to cost more than some of its new rivals, such as the Nissan Ariya and the Kia EV6. After all, the four rings on the front will come at a premium price.

From a broader viewpoint, the introduction of the Q4 e-tron highlights the adaptability of the MEB platform used by the Volkswagen Group, which is already the foundation for a wide range of vehicles from the VW, SEAT, and Skoda brands. Smaller variants of the MEB toolkit are also being used by Wolfsburg for smaller EVs like the ID.3 hatchback, which will receive multiple variations across the brands of the VW Group, as well as for larger vehicles like the planned ID.BUZZ electric MPV.

Peter Kssler, board member for manufacturing and logistics at Audi AG, stated that the cross-brand collaboration in Zwickau “demonstrates once again the immense synergy potential that we have with the Volkswagen Group.” “The Audi Q4 e-production tron’s began on schedule, which is a credit to the excellent cooperation between Volkswagen and Audi employees. Our small electric SUV is clearly an Audi, and both its exceptional quality and practicality will wow our consumers.”

Audi’s historic mills in Neckarsulm and Ingolstadt will start producing electric Audis starting next year, so the Zwickau facility won’t be the only manufacturer of MEB-platform vehicles for long. These will be built on the Premium Platform Electric (PPE) platform, which is shared with Porsche, and will initially go into production at the Ingolstadt facility. Along with plug-in hybrids, Audi also intends to offer more than 20 battery-electric cars by 2025.

Exactly how much the Q4 will cost is now one of the biggest unknowns.

Are there any electric SUVs whose introduction you intend to attend this year? Tell us in the comments section below.

To assist users in providing their email addresses, this content was produced and maintained by a third party and imported onto this website. You might be able to discover more details on this and related material at