Since the Kia K5 moniker is just an alpha-numeric label, it probably has no special significance. Many Kia models are offered in South Korea under labels like this; for example, the Rio and Telluride, which are sold in the United States by their full names, are sold there under the labels K2, K3, and K9.
It’s unclear whether Kia will maintain this practice with the names of its models in the United States or if this labeling pattern is an anomaly. In fact, it’s possible that Kia is unsure as well and is watching to see how the new name is received.
In This Article...
What is the Kia K5?
A Kia Optima that has been renamed and given a new design is the 2021 Kia K5. The outcome is an entirely new midsize sedan that, according to Kia, is meant to “disrupt and inspire.” Since it reached its second generation, the Kia Optima has been marketed as the Kia K5 in South Korea and other nations.
How similar are the Kia Optima and K5?
Technically, the Kia K5 “The K5 is the Kia Optima, but it also takes the place of the Kia Optima. Vehicle names may be altered or changed outside of the US. Kia opted to drop the name this year “Optima and take the name K5 in Korean.
Is the Kia K5 pricey enough?
Yes, the Kia K5 is a quality vehicle. It offers a smooth ride, respectable fuel numbers, and powerful turbocharged engines. The interior of this Kia is attractive, and the seats are comfortable. Both the infotainment functions and the standard driver assistance technology are simple to operate.
What sort of vehicle is K5?
Although the 2022 Kia K5 is categorized as a family car, its intriguing appearance and 290-horsepower engine choice hint at something sexier. A good value play, the sedan formerly known as the Kia Optima isn’t about to unseat its consistently excellent opponent, the Honda Accord, but it does have a long list of popular features and competitive pricing. Even more, we included it in our list of 2022 editors’ picks. Every model comes with standard infotainment technology and active safety measures, and the sedan’s beautiful interior is enhanced with a large back seat. The K5 GT has a beefed-up engine, and it will either entice or turn away customers with its tire-spinning antics. The only way to get all-wheel drive is through the standard powerplant, which is mostly obnoxious. The 2022 K5 is a great sedan overall, whether it is purchased for a family or not, despite a driver’s seat that is excessively high and ride isolation that is badly influenced by the largest available wheel-and-tire combination.
Optima or K5: Which is larger?
The 2021 K5 has more aggressive looks and feels while driving through Orlando because it is broader, lower, and longer than the 2020 Optima. The end result is a vehicle that gives you extra space, whether you’re driving around Orlando on a regular basis or bringing the family on a vacation.
Is the stinger the same as the K5?
The ever-popular automaker offers two competitive sedans: the Kia K5 and the Kia Stinger. The Kia Stinger boasts a sporty aesthetic, whilst the Kia K5 makes its initial appearance in 2021. Although the Kia K5 is a new car, the Kia Optima served as its predecessor.
The new Optima or the Kia K5?
The brand-new Kia K5, which succeeds the Optima in the Kia lineup, went on sale in 2021. Harvey drivers wishing to add luxury and sportiness to their everyday commutes and weekend excursions have a strong option in this sleek, angular midsize sedan.
What issues does the Kia K5 have?
A particular model year 2021 Sorento and 20212022 K5 equipped with 2.5L turbocharged engines are being recalled by Kia Motor America (Kia). The pipe connection between the high-pressure fuel pump and fuel rail is susceptible to fuel leaks. Fuel leaks have the effect of raising the likelihood of a fire.
How much is a Kia K5 with all the options?
The $31,090 MSRP of the 2022 Kia K5 GT does have a lot going for it in terms of aesthetics. First, the looks, as we have mentioned. aggressive although not as overtly so as some sports sedans. It’s odd that the full-fat GT, unlike the K5 GT-Line, is actually front-wheel drive, but hey, there are still plenty of fantastic FWD sports sedans and hatchbacks. I’m addressing you, Honda Civic Type R.
When you review a spec sheet, the situation remains upbeat. A massive 290 horsepower and 311 lb-ft of torque are produced by the turbocharged four-cylinder engine. The 8-speed dual-clutch transmission from Hyundai/Kia is coupled with everything. Additionally, the inside is improved over the original K5, with features like GT-specific seats and finer materials.
Are KIAS still valuable?
We’ll venture the bold assumption that you’ll want to sell your car for as much money as you can. You want to recover as much of the cost of the investment as you can because it was expensive. All cars lose value over time, but some do it more quickly than others.
IntelliChoice calculated the average retained values for a brand’s full model portfolio over a five-year period to find out. These estimates allow us to identify which manufacturers’ vehicles have better depreciation resistance. Let’s talk about the automobile brands that lose value more quickly now that we’ve determined which ones do so the best.
Mini: 50.4 Percent Retained Value
A fairly, well, small percentage of drivers are drawn to Mini automobiles because of its size, which lives up to its name. Models with charming aesthetics and nimble handling, like the retro Cooper, sporty Countryman crossover, or funky Clubman wagon, attract drivers with an eye for fashion and a sense of adventure but, more crucially, who can manage their diminutive dimensions. However, doubts about future worth may put buyers’ first enchantment to rest. The Countryman and Clubman receive a Poor five-year cost of ownership rating from IntelliChoice. Furthermore, we weren’t too impressed by the brand’s recent attempts at electrification. As joyful as Mini’s cars are to look at and drive, the brand’s market position is indicated by its value retention rate of 50.4%.
Mazda: 49.3 Percent Retained Value
Mazda doesn’t compare to other Japanese brands in terms of name recognition, lineup diversity, or value despite producing some of the best-looking and best-driving mainstream cars on the market. Even though the Mazda3 and Miata have sizable fan groups, those and other models may place a greater emphasis on driving characteristics than general utility. The Mazda6 lagged behind rival sedans until it was recently discontinued, while the CX-30 and CX-9 are less adaptable than rival crossovers. Although we usually love driving a Mazda, its value retention rate of 49.3 percent isn’t as high as that of its primary rivals. Possibly the brand’s next, higher-end vehicles will hold their value longer.
Kia: 47.7 Percent Retained Value
Kia has put a lot of effort into keeping up with its rivals in terms of quality, dynamics, and design. Want proof? The Sorento is back and even better than before, the Telluride won our competition for SUV of the Year, and the Optima’s makeover into the K5 gave this sedan new life. However, despite their appeal in other areas, Kia’s automobiles behind with an average value retention rate of 47.7% during a five-year period. Despite its extensive standard warranty and genuinely enticing options, that is the case. Even while we enjoy driving the Telluride and the sporty Stinger, Kia still needs to improve as evidenced by their respective Mediocre and Poor IntelliChoice scores.
Hyundai: 47.1 Percent Retained Value
Hyundai strives to match the reputation for quality and durability of Toyota and Honda, much like its corporate rival Kia. The long-term value proposition of Hyundai doesn’t appear to have been significantly impacted by a lengthy warranty or a group of very regarded experts. Models like the Sonata, Palisade, and Tucson serve as indicators of how far the brand’s products have come. However, Hyundai’s 47.1 retained value % suggests that it needs to do more to earn the trust of customers who value their money.
Volkswagen: 46.9 Percent Retained Value
Volkswagen’s image for quality suffered as a result of the Dieselgate incident, even though the company didn’t have a very strong one to begin with. Volkswagen lacks American and Asian rivals in mass-market appeal, even with more recent models like the Tiguan or Atlas, which only manage Average or Mediocre IntelliChoice value scores depending on trim. A shorter warranty is detrimental to its cause. Volkswagen is planning a number of electric vehicles, which might assist the company’s current 46.9% value retention percentage.
Nissan: 45.6 Percent Retained Value
Nissan has struggled to gain momentum and maintain its competitive position after a high-level organizational restructuring. It is currently working on refreshing its stale lineup. We were impressed by some of those efforts, like the Rogue and Sentra. Others, such as the legendary Z sports vehicle or the Pathfinder, stop at simply spiffing up antiquated platforms and engines. Despite the merits of Nissan’s engineering advancements, only a small percentage of its vehicles receive Good IntelliChoice value scores; the majority are ranked at Average, Mediocre, or Poor in terms of ownership costs. Nissan has a dismal 45.6 percent average value retention over a five-year period.
Buick: 42.3 Percent Retained Value
What does Buick mean today? Buick doesn’t seem to be confident in itself. Due to the brand’s current inventory consisting solely of SUVs, its tradition of opulent vintage sedans has come to an end. All of those models aren’t particularly terrible, but they don’t do much to change the outdated perception of Buick. Additionally, Buick’s uncertain positioning does not help. Does it aim for real luxury to compete with the best in the field, or does it aim for a premium experience at entry-level pricing? We believe Buick requires revival and a more focused course. If and when it occurs, it might improve the lineup’s average value retention, which is 42.3 percent.
Mitsubishi: 41.3 Percent Retained Value
Many of the Mitsubishi vehicles we’ve evaluated are affordable, but not just financially. We’ve encountered subpar engineering and craftsmanship in Mitsubishi cars, which leads to dull driving experiences. The Mirage and Eclipse Cross are among the least expensive options in their respective sectors, which is obvious from their flimsy construction and crude driving characteristics. The previous Outlander’s available electric driving range deserves praise, but the revised three-row SUV falls short of expectations. Mitsubishi’s value retention rate of 41.3% is significantly lower than that of other brands. Every other Mitsubishi has a Mediocre or Poor IntelliChoice ownership rating, leaving just the outdated Outlander Hybrid.
Chrysler: 40.2 Percent Retained Value
Any carmaker would find it challenging to maintain a two-model lineup, especially if those options are designed to compete in some of the least-wanted segments of the market. But Chrysler is going in that direction. Despite having advantages of its own, the 300 sedan and Pacifica minivan just do not appeal to the tastes of contemporary drivers. Only a layer of gradual improvements can hide the 300’s deterioration. Considering that it is a minivan, the Pacifica (and its fleet-only Voyager counterpart) is actually rather decent. Although Chrysler’s future is uncertain, introducing models that are contemporary in design could increase the lineup’s average value retention rate of 40.2%.
Fiat: 39.5 Percent Retained Value
Fiat’s tiny, quirky cars briefly appeared ready to inject some Italian panache into the compact car market. But that period has passed, and it is now clear that Fiats are less attractive than they once were. The 500X subcompact crossover is the only vehicle currently offered by the brand. Its cute design and standard AWD can’t make up for its sloppy driving manners and shoddy construction. Fiat’s abysmal 39.5 percent retention rate is the weakest among major brands because the 500X symbolizes the complete lineup.
Is the K5 a turbocharged vehicle?
A 180-hp turbocharged 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine paired with an eight-speed automated transmission powers the majority of K5 variants. Front-wheel drive is the engine’s default setup; all-wheel drive is an option, although not available on the GT variant. The 180-horsepower, front-drive K5 we tested had good acceleration in town, and our testing showed a 7.0-second sprint to 60 mph. At highway speeds, though, it was less spectacular because passing took more time. Nevertheless, thanks to a reliable transmission and a well-insulated cabin, the engine noise was usually kept to a low roar. The 2.5-liter turbo-four in the full-Monty GT model is more potent and produces 290 horsepower and 311 pound-feet of torque. The sportiest K5 is equipped with bigger brakes, a special suspension tuning, and wider tires on larger 19-inch wheels in addition to its specialized eight-speed automatic (with the same wet dual-clutch as the Hyundai Sonata N Line). The GT we were driving reached 60 mph in 5.2 seconds and came to a complete stop from 70 mph in 163 feet. The Sonata N Line stopped even quicker and reached 60 mph in in 5.0 seconds (152 feet). The hi-po Hyundai we tried, on the other hand, came only with all-season tires, which added to the performance discrepancies.