The 2018 Kia Sportage has a smooth ride, a stylish, large interior, and a high expected dependability rating. Despite its small load area and underwhelming performance, this Kia manages to rank in the top third of the compact SUV class.
In This Article...
How durable is a 2018 Kia Sportage?
The Kia Sportage has an estimated range of 200,000 to 250,000 kilometers. If your Sportage is well maintained and you drive conservatively, it should last 1317 years based on 15,000 miles driven annually.
Do Kia Sportage issues frequently arise?
This generation’s Sportage has had very few reported issues because it is a well-built vehicle. There have been a few problems with non-engine electrics, mostly with the starting process and the sat-nav system (where installed).
What is the Kia Sportage’s typical price?
What Is the Price of a Kia Sportage? Starting at $24,090, the entry-level 2021 Sportage LX is marginally less expensive than usual for a compact SUV. Starting prices for the S and EX mid-level trims are $26,590 and $27,390, respectively. At $33,750, the top-of-the-line SX Turbo variant is available.
Why is the 2018 Kia Sportage flawed?
Kia Sportage recalls from 2018 Certain Sportage and Cadenza models from the model years 2017 through 2021 are being recalled by Kia Motors America (Kia). A fire in the engine compartment could result from the electrical circuit in the Hydraulic Electronic Control Unit (HECU) short-circuiting.
Has the Kia Sportage’s transmission have issues?
One excellent SUV is the Kia Sportage. It is well-rated for safety and offers a cozy interior. It has been reported to have a number of widespread issues, though.
These include faults with the engine, transmission, electrical system, suspension, and external quality. Do your homework and be ready for repairs if you’re thinking about purchasing a Kia Sportage.
Regardless of any issues, many drivers clearly enjoy the automobile because of how comfortable it is.
Which Kia Sportage year is the most dependable?
Since its introduction in 1995, the Kia Sportage has been a superb automobile. It’s entertaining to drive since this SUV is a scaled-down version of other sports utility vehicles. You might be wondering if there are certain Kia Sportage years to steer clear of if you’re considering making an investment in this unusual vehicle.
Learn more about the Kia Sportage years to steer clear of by reading on. In order for you to make an informed choice about the car you can invest in for yourself, we will also cover the years that have performed successfully. Make sure you receive the safest and most effective used car you can afford when you buy one.
Kia Sportage Years to Avoid
Along with fantastic models, the Kia Sportage has seen several bad ones over the years. The Kia brand has had to make a slow recovery from 2012, which was the worst of all. When shopping at used cars, there are a few models you should be careful to avoid.
The following significant Kia Sportage years should be avoided:
- 2012
- 2013
- 2001
- 2009
- 2008
- 2000
- 2011
The most significant problem during these years was engine failure, which made them both unreliable and expensive. Learn more about each of these issues and why they provide such a challenge for this vehicle’s drivers by continuing to read.
You can always be sure that you got the greatest value possible since CoPilot scans your neighborhood and notifies you if there is a better deal on a comparable vehicle nearby. The best approach to purchase a car is through the CoPilot app.
What Makes These Years Worth Avoiding?
2012 was the Kia Sportage’s worst year ever, but all of the years previously mentioned had their issues. It’s crucial to become familiar with each of them so you can decide which is ideal for your future and pick an automobile that is both secure and affordable to maintain.
- engine issues
- internal problems
- Having braking issues
Despite the fact that there were numerous additional, more minor complaints about the aforementioned vehicle models, these were some of the more common ones.
Continue reading to find out more about each of these grievances. Some of these issues are more serious than others, but they all have the potential to cost you money if they arise while you are driving. Knowing this can help you decide which Kia Sportage years to steer clear of.
Engine Problems
Engine problems, especially with the 2012 model, have been the Kia Sportage’s major problem. There have been numerous engine issues with this car’s various variants, which have resulted in numerous consumer complaints. Many Kia models have failed due to engine issues.
Some of the particular engine problems include:
- engine blowing
- driving while the engine is dead
- Engine knocking noise
These are just a handful of the Kia Sportage model’s engine issues that have been reported.
Drivers may experience costly and dangerous engine problems. In order to save money, it is better to stay away from Kia Sportage models that are prone to this problem. Over the years, the models from 2011 through 2013 have had the most customer complaints regarding engine problems.
One of the best purchases you can make is a used or CPO luxury car since you can get a lot of car for not a lot of money. A three-year-old premium car may be found for around half of what it would cost new. To get the greatest offers, look through this list of the top used luxury vehicles.
Interior Issues
Interior difficulties are another one of the Kia Sportage’s frequent troubles. Customers have expressed dissatisfaction with several interior comfort accoutrements, particularly with some of the pre-2010 versions. Although they won’t affect how the car drives, these could make driving the Kia Sportage uncomfortable.
Some models’ interior problems include:
- Problems in the air conditioning
- difficulties with the interior accessories
- difficulties with seatbelts
None of these are useful to drivers or passengers, and their replacement can be pricey.
If you are spending money on a car, the interior should function properly. Spending money on a Kia Sportage model that is subpar is a waste. You may avoid making this error if you are aware of the Kia Sportage years to stay away from.
Braking Troubles
Braking troubles were also one among the Kia Sportage’s major problems. The 2011 model was particularly affected by this issue. For the safety of the vehicle and its occupants, braking is essential. For this reason alone, it is advised to stay away from these models.
The Kia Sportage’s latest models do a better job of maintaining the paint on the car. To find out which Kia Sportage years are best for you to buy, continue reading. The ones on the following list will provide you with the best value for your money.
Gap insurance can stop you from making payments on a car that has already been totaled, but is it really worth it? We clearly explain what gap insurance is, whether it’s worthwhile, and more with many of examples.
Which Years are Safe to Buy Used?
We can talk about the possibilities that will provide you the most value for your money now that you know which years are the worst for you to invest in. Even with so many subpar models, numerous Kia Sportage years have stuck out from the crowd.
- 2017
- 2019
- 2018
- 2021
- 2007
If you’re looking for a fantastic car, consider one of these makes. The shortcomings of the older Kia Sportages have been greatly improved in the later models. Look at the new models of this vehicle for the best performance on the road if you want a car that will give you everything you need and more.
Conclusion
You can make an informed decision about your next model to make sure you invest your money in the best available alternative on the market now that you are aware of which Kia Sportage to stay away from. To get the most value for your money, you can contrast the positive and negative aspects.
Making a purchase this significant requires that you receive an automobile that will meet all of your needs. You don’t want to get a vehicle that will cost you as much to repair as you did to purchase it. There are a lot of excellent Kia Sportage models, but there are also a lot of subpar ones.
Get a Curated List of the Best Used Cars Near You
The simplest way to purchase a car is using the CoPilot auto shopping app. You may create a customized list of the top car listings in your area by telling us what you’re looking for, and we’ll search the inventories of every dealership in your area.
Just seeking for more recent models? The search engine for virtually new vehicles is CoPilot Compare. only observe recentfive years or lessautos with little mileage. The greatest place to look for off-lease, early trade-in, and CPO vehicles is CoPilot Compare.
What’s best? We have more information on each vehicle than our rivals since CoPilot was developed using the same technologies that dealerships use to acquire and sell their inventories. Since CoPilot doesn’t partner with automakers, there aren’t any sponsored posts or other dubious tacticsjust the most information about the best vehicles. To learn more about CoPilot’s operation, see our About Us page.
How many miles can a Kia Sportage travel?
The Sportage, Kia’s first sport utility vehicle that made its way to American soil in 1995, is currently one of the Korean automaker’s best-selling models. The tiny SUV is generally regarded as being reliable and inexpensive.
What is the lifespan of a Kia Sportage then? Many drivers achieve 150,000, 200,000, or even 250,000 miles or more with little repairs, according to discussions on Kia Forums and owner reviews on Vehicle History. driving 12,000 miles annually, which translates to 12.5 to more than 20 years of service.
One reviewer on Vehicle History claims, “I acquired my Kia as a used car…it has 189,000 miles…runs fine, and is 13 years old.”
very reliable To ensure that it continues to work efficiently, I keep up with routine maintenance.
“[My Sportage] has approximately 200,000 miles on it,” says another reviewer. The wipers and brake pads were both changed. There was nothing serious when the check engine light turned on.
Routine maintenance is a prevalent theme with high-mileage Sportage claims.
Are Kias still worth anything?
We’ll venture the bold assumption that you’ll want to sell your car for as much money as you can. You want to recover as much of the cost of the investment as you can because it was expensive. All cars lose value over time, but some do it more quickly than others.
IntelliChoice calculated the average retained values for a brand’s full model portfolio over a five-year period to find out. These estimates allow us to identify which manufacturers’ vehicles have better depreciation resistance. Let’s talk about the automobile brands that lose value more quickly now that we’ve determined which ones do so the best.
Mini: 50.4 Percent Retained Value
A fairly, well, small percentage of drivers are drawn to Mini automobiles because of its size, which lives up to its name. Models with charming aesthetics and nimble handling, like the retro Cooper, sporty Countryman crossover, or funky Clubman wagon, attract drivers with an eye for fashion and a sense of adventure but, more crucially, who can manage their diminutive dimensions. However, doubts about future worth may put buyers’ first enchantment to rest. The Countryman and Clubman receive a Poor five-year cost of ownership rating from IntelliChoice. Furthermore, we weren’t too impressed by the brand’s recent attempts at electrification. As joyful as Mini’s cars are to look at and drive, the brand’s market position is indicated by its value retention rate of 50.4%.
Mazda: 49.3 Percent Retained Value
Mazda doesn’t compare to other Japanese brands in terms of name recognition, lineup diversity, or value despite producing some of the best-looking and best-driving mainstream cars on the market. Even though the Mazda3 and Miata have sizable fan groups, those and other models may place a greater emphasis on driving characteristics than general utility. The Mazda6 lagged behind rival sedans until it was recently discontinued, while the CX-30 and CX-9 are less adaptable than rival crossovers. Although we usually love driving a Mazda, its value retention rate of 49.3 percent isn’t as high as that of its primary rivals. Possibly the brand’s upcoming, higher-end vehicles will hold their value longer.
Kia: 47.7 Percent Retained Value
Kia has put a lot of effort into keeping up with its rivals in terms of quality, dynamics, and design. Want proof? The Sorento is back and even better than before, the Telluride won our competition for SUV of the Year, and the Optima’s makeover into the K5 gave this sedan new life. However, despite their appeal in other areas, Kia’s automobiles behind with an average value retention rate of 47.7% during a five-year period. Despite its extensive standard warranty and genuinely enticing options, that is the case. Even while we enjoy driving the Telluride and the sporty Stinger, Kia still needs to improve as evidenced by their respective Mediocre and Poor IntelliChoice scores.
Hyundai: 47.1 Percent Retained Value
Hyundai strives to match the reputation for quality and durability of Toyota and Honda, much like its corporate rival Kia. The long-term value proposition of Hyundai doesn’t appear to have been significantly impacted by a lengthy warranty or a group of very regarded experts. Models like the Sonata, Palisade, and Tucson serve as indicators of how far the brand’s products have come. However, Hyundai’s 47.1 retained value % suggests that it needs to do more to earn the trust of customers who value their money.
Volkswagen: 46.9 Percent Retained Value
Volkswagen’s image for quality suffered as a result of the Dieselgate incident, even though the company didn’t have a very strong one to begin with. Volkswagen lacks American and Asian rivals in mass-market appeal, even with more recent models like the Tiguan or Atlas, which only manage Average or Mediocre IntelliChoice value scores depending on trim. A shorter warranty is detrimental to its cause. Volkswagen is planning a number of electric vehicles, which might assist the company’s current 46.9% value retention percentage.
Nissan: 45.6 Percent Retained Value
Nissan has struggled to gain momentum and maintain its competitive position after a high-level organizational restructuring. It is currently working on refreshing its stale lineup. We were impressed by some of those efforts, like the Rogue and Sentra. Others, such as the legendary Z sports vehicle or the Pathfinder, stop at simply spiffing up antiquated platforms and engines. Despite the merits of Nissan’s engineering advancements, only a small percentage of its vehicles receive Good IntelliChoice value scores; the majority are ranked at Average, Mediocre, or Poor in terms of ownership costs. Nissan has a dismal 45.6 percent average value retention over a five-year period.
Buick: 42.3 Percent Retained Value
What does Buick mean today? Buick doesn’t seem to be confident in itself. Due to the brand’s current inventory consisting solely of SUVs, its tradition of opulent vintage sedans has come to an end. All of those models aren’t particularly terrible, but they don’t do much to change the outdated perception of Buick. Additionally, Buick’s uncertain positioning does not help. Does it aim for real luxury to compete with the best in the field, or does it aim for a premium experience at entry-level pricing? We believe Buick requires revival and a more focused course. If and when it occurs, it might improve the lineup’s average value retention, which is 42.3 percent.
Mitsubishi: 41.3 Percent Retained Value
Many of the Mitsubishi vehicles we’ve evaluated are affordable, but not just financially. We’ve encountered subpar engineering and craftsmanship in Mitsubishi cars, which leads to dull driving experiences. The Mirage and Eclipse Cross are among the least expensive options in their respective sectors, which is obvious from their flimsy construction and crude driving characteristics. The previous Outlander’s available electric driving range deserves praise, but the revised three-row SUV falls short of expectations. Mitsubishi’s value retention rate of 41.3% is significantly lower than that of other brands. Every other Mitsubishi has a Mediocre or Poor IntelliChoice ownership rating, leaving just the outdated Outlander Hybrid.
Chrysler: 40.2 Percent Retained Value
Any carmaker would find it challenging to maintain a two-model lineup, especially if those options are designed to compete in some of the least-wanted segments of the market. But Chrysler is going in that direction. Despite having advantages of its own, the 300 sedan and Pacifica minivan just do not appeal to the tastes of contemporary drivers. Only a layer of gradual improvements can hide the 300’s deterioration. Considering that it is a minivan, the Pacifica (and its fleet-only Voyager counterpart) is actually rather decent. Although Chrysler’s future is uncertain, introducing models that are contemporary in design could increase the lineup’s average value retention rate of 40.2%.
Fiat: 39.5 Percent Retained Value
Fiat’s tiny, quirky cars briefly appeared ready to inject some Italian panache into the compact car market. But that period has passed, and it is now clear that Fiats are less attractive than they once were. The 500X subcompact crossover is the only vehicle currently offered by the brand. Its cute design and standard AWD can’t make up for its sloppy driving manners and shoddy construction. Fiat’s abysmal 39.5 percent retention rate is the weakest among major brands because the 500X symbolizes the complete lineup.