In North America, the Lancer debuted in 2001 as a straight replacement for the Mirage for the 2002 model year. Between the 1950s until the 1980s, Chrysler sold a distinct Dodge Lancer in the United States. However, the rights to the “Lancer” moniker were given to Mitsubishi for use in North America when Daimler, who at the time owned Chrysler, briefly controlled Mitsubishi through the DaimlerChrysler-Mitsubishi alliance from 2000 to 2004. Because of this, the successor model was given the Lancer brand for the first time after Mitsubishi stopped selling the Mirage from the 1995 series in North America in 2001.
The 2.0-liter 4G94 engine that powered North American Lancers put out 120 horsepower (89 kW) and 130 lb-ft (176 Nm) of torque. The 2.0-liter DOHC 4G63 engine was offered in the DE, ES, LS, and GS grades of the Lancer sedan in Mexico.
In This Article...
What type of motor does a Mitsubishi Lancer have?
Power and acceleration. A 2.0-liter, four-cylinder engine with 148 horsepower is standard on the 2017 Lancer ES 2.0 base model. A 2.4-liter, four-cylinder engine with 168 horsepower is standard on all-wheel drive variants.
Is there a 4G63 engine in the Lancer?
For years, Mitsubishi vehicles in the World Rally Championships (WRC) have been powered by its turbocharged variation, the G63T (also often known to as the 4G63), including the Lancer EX 2000 Turbo, Galant VR-4, Lancer Evolution, Carisma GT, and Lancer WRC04. When Tommi Mkinen won his four straight WRC titles in his Lancer, it was the engine of the Lancer Evolution. These engines were powered by both MHI and T-4 turbos. A 1.7L version of the 4G63 was also employed in a Komvet Racing-built McLaren F1 Evo, which was designed specifically for hill climbs.
Do Mitsubishi Lancers have turbochargers?
The turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine in the high-performance, all-wheel-drive Lancer Evolution generates 291 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque. It is available with a six-speed automatic manual transmission or a five-speed manual transmission.
Does the Evo’s engine fit the Mitsubishi Lancer?
We should examine the differences between the two autos in order to investigate this further. The Lancer Ralliart has the same Evo X 2.0-liter turbocharged engine that has been detuned via intake and ECU adjustments to limit the power to a reasonable 235 hp. The Lancer Ralliart takes its moniker from the Galant and Starion Ralliart-badged cars from Mitsubishi’s history (a 56 hp reduction from the Evo X). The remaining difference resembled a list of discarded parts from the Mitsubishi storage. The Ralliart is built on a chassis from a Lancer GTS, an AWD system from an Evo IX, an Evo X exhaust, and a hood from an Evo X. As a result, it’s not as simple as merely claiming that your Evo X has been adjusted; the two vehicles actually differ.
How quick is the Mitsubishi Lancer?
The Mitsubishi Lancer is the fastest vehicle Mitsubishi has ever produced historically, and the Lancer is present in all ten of the fastest vehicles. The Lancer Evolution X FQ440 clocks in first with the fastest 0 to 60 mph timings (3.6 seconds).
An engine in a 2010 Lancer is what?
Power and acceleration. A 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine in the DE and ES Lancers produces 152 horsepower, while a 2.4-liter four-cylinder in the GTS produces 168 horsepower.
Are 4G63 engines reliable?
The 4G63 is an extremely powerful engine that can go beyond the 250,000 mile mark when it is completely stock. The primary engine components itself are unlikely to ever show you any issues thanks to forged internals and a sturdy block. On standard engines, lifter issues and bearing shaft failure are still possible, but modified 4G63 engines are almost the only ones that experience crankwalk and lifting heads.
However, given the 4G63popularity T’s as a tuner engine, stock reliability is rather less significant. Without any significant reliability changes, the 4G63 is thought to be dependable up to about 450whp. However, as soon as you surpass certain thresholds, you’ll need to start considering fortifying the block and updating a number of interior parts.
The earlier 6-bolt engines are thought to be a little bit more dependable and powerful than the later 7-bolt engines. Naturally, power tends to increase at a lower reliability. Once your 4G63 exceeds 500whp, cracked cranks, crankwalk, raised heads, broken rods, low end block issues, etc. all start to occur frequently.
Overall, these engines are quite strong and, when fully built, can generate insane 1000whp+ levels. They are incredibly dependable when completely stock and when fully built. When tuned, they will need certain upgrades and advancements in between. Due to its higher strength and power restrictions, the 4G63 is still in demand today. This is especially true when contrasted to the 4B11T, which frequently experiences block issues once torque above 400wtq.
What kind of engine is in the 2008 Lancer?
With a brand-new 2.0-liter DOHC MIVEC 4-cylinder engine that comes standard in all variants, the 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer has performance that will leave you wanting more. As the first Mitsubishi in North America to offer a continuously variable gearbox (CVT) as an option in place of an automatic transmission, the new-generation Lancer also features an optional CVT. When the optional CVT is installed, the Lancer GTS is the only vehicle in the segment to have a 6-step Sportronic that enables the driver to manually manage the CVT using magnesium steering wheel paddle shifters.
With 152 hp at 6,000 rpm (Federal Tier 2, Bin 5 emissions), the new-generation Lancer’s 2.0-liter DOHC MIVEC 4-cylinder engine is one of the most potent standard engines in its segment, representing a considerable 26-percent increase over the previous Lancer’s 120 hp 2.0-liter engine. The new 2.0-liter engine produces 76.0 horsepower per liter, which is a high specific output. The 2008 Lancer’s engine also produces significantly more torque than the model it replaces, with peak torque of 146 lb.-ft. at 4,250 rpm as opposed to 130 lb.-ft. for the earlier model. The Lancer has 143 horsepower at 6,000 rpm and 143 lb.-ft. of peak torque at 4,250 rpm, and it is PZEV-certified for California.
The CVT, an optional feature on all 2008 Lancer models, improves performance and fuel efficiency over the lighter and less potent preceding model. It functions more smoothly than conventional automatic gearboxes.
The new Lancer is significantly faster than the outgoing model in both standing-start acceleration and passing performance, whether it is equipped with the revamped base 5-speed manual transmission or the optional CVT. The 2008 Lancer’s acceleration from 0 to 60 mph with the standard 5-speed manual transmission takes less than nine seconds.
The Lancer can accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in ten seconds when using its optional CVT, which is around two seconds faster than the previous model’s available 4-speed automatic transmission. Based on a revised calculation method EPA recommended for all 2008 vehicles, the Lancer with an optional CVT achieves an estimated 22 mpg city/29 mpg highway.
The Lancer’s new 2.0-liter DOHC MIVEC 4-cylinder engine features a revised 5-speed manual transmission to manage the increased power output. Compared to the old transmission housing, the new one is half an inch shorter. Double-cone synchronizers are now employed in third and fourth gears, and a new honing method was implemented to cut down on noise. For the torque curve of the new engine, gear ratios have been revised.
The 2.0-liter engine in the 2008 Lancer is built on an entirely new architecture that makes use of modern technology and weight-saving features. The upcoming Lancer Evolution engine will likewise be built on the new aluminum cylinder block. Aluminum also makes up the cylinder head. In contrast to the prior single overhead cam (SOHC) layout, the double overhead cam (DOHC) cylinder head has four valves per cylinder. Throughout the engine’s working range, the Mitsubishi Innovative Valve Timing Electronic Control (MIVEC), a constantly variable valve timing system, ensures excellent power, high fuel efficiency, and low emissions. The MIVEC system on the Lancer controls both the intake and exhaust valves.
The bore and stroke of the new 2.0-liter engine are both 86.0 mm, which engineers refer to as being “square.” The 2.0-liter engine from the previous generation of the Lancer, on the other hand, had a long stroke (or “under-square”) configuration, with a bore of 81.5 mm and a stroke of 95.8 mm.
The revised cylinder sizes help to provide the Lancer fast and flexible reactions typical of a larger-displacement engine, as well as a free-revving nature (6,500 rpm redline) and an excellent combination of linear power delivery and wide torque curve.
For instance, the new Lancer 2.0-liter engine, in large part because of the MIVEC technology, is already producing as much torque at 2,500 rpm as the old engine did at its maximum at 4,250 rpm. The Lancer’s high mid-range torque will increase the car’s responsiveness during routine driving.
The new Lancer 2.0-liter MIVEC engine still burns ordinary fuel but has a greater compression ratio (10:1 as opposed to 9.5:1 for the outgoing engine) (87 AKI). Instead of a belt, a timing chain enables a more compact design and also aids in reliability. Iridium spark plugs assist in extending major service intervals for lower ownership costs and help reduce pollutants. The only vehicles with an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system are those that are California PZEV-certified.
The redesigned aluminum cylinder block and head are the most notable weight-saving features and technology used in the new Lancer engine. The new model’s agile handling is a result of a reduction in overall engine weight of 59.5 lbs. compared to the iron-block Lancer 2.0-liter engine from the previous generation.
A double-layer stainless steel exhaust manifold and a cam cover and intake manifold made of plastic are additional weight-saving measures. The transverse engine’s back location for the exhaust manifold offers significant advantages over the prior engine’s front arrangement. The catalysts can be packaged more easily toward the back, resulting in a quicker “light off” and higher emissions performance. A flat front suspension crossmember can be used instead of the prior saddle-shaped crossmember required to clear the exhaust pipe, which is stronger. This is explained in more detail in the “Dynamics” part of this press kit.
Engine performance is optimized by variable valve timing systems in response to operational circumstances. Four optimum engine-operating modes are offered by the Lancer’s MIVEC system, which independently controls the intake and exhaust cam timing.
- The majority of the time, valve overlap is raised to decrease pumping losses in order to ensure the best fuel economy. For a larger expansion ratio, the timing of the exhaust valve opening is delayed, improving fuel efficiency.
- The timing of the intake valve closure is delayed to synchronize the intake air pulsations for more air volume when maximum power is required (high engine speed and load).
- The intake valve closing timing is advanced by MIVEC under low-speed, high load conditions to ensure enough air volume. To give a larger expansion ratio and increased efficiency, the exhaust valve opening timing is also delayed.
- In order to stabilize combustion, valve overlap is reduced at idle.
Mitsubishi used a 4-point inertial axis system with cylinder hydraulic engine mounts on the left and right sides to help maintain the 2.0-liter MIVEC engine’s quiet, smooth functioning in the new Lancer. On the right side mount (engine side), a lightweight, very stiff squeeze-cast aluminum bracket aids in lowering engine noise during acceleration. Gear noise is decreased thanks to a thin, very strong steel plate bracket on the left side mount (transmission side). For the front and rear mounts, a specially tuned insulator was created to help reduce acceleration shock and idle vibration.
The Lancer is unique in its market in that it offers a CVT as an option rather than a typical automatic transmission. A CVT offers a smoother driving experience than a conventional automatic transmission in addition to improving performance and fuel efficiency. The outcome is a more luxurious driving experience for the motorist.
Engineers must choose fixed gear ratios for a conventional automatic transmission in order to provide the best performance and efficiency trade-off for all customers and driving scenarios. In contrast, a CVT works with a pulley system that enables unlimited variation between the highest and lowest attainable ratios without any noticeable changes or discrete steps. A CVT responds to changing vehicle speeds seamlessly, enabling the engine speed to stay at its highest degree of efficiency, enhancing fuel economy and reducing exhaust pollutants. The user gains from smoother performance because a CVT does not “change” gears.
The Lancer’s CVT has a final drive ratio of 6.12 and a ratio range of 2.349 to 0.394. When compared to the previous available 4-speed automatic transmission, which had ratios of 2.842/1.529/1.000/0.712 and a 4.04 final drive, the resulting ratio dispersion is significantly greater. Because the gearbox ratio constantly adjusts to the driver’s current power needs and the driving conditions, a CVT can provide greater flexibility than even a traditional 6-speed automatic transmission.
A manufacturer must utilize careful tuning and unique control software to create a good driving experience because a CVT delivers a markedly distinct driving sensation for the consumer by nature. Mitsubishi’s INVECS III software enhances the responsiveness and drivability of the CVT by tailoring the shift strategy to each driver’s unique patterns of braking and acceleration.
When the driver steps on the gas pedal, the engine and the vehicle speed both increase simultaneously, with noticeable rev reductions in between gearshifts. The Mitsubishi CVT, on the other hand, adjusts the ratio to fit the power requirements, allowing the engine to rev to its optimal-efficiency speed for a given throttle opening and vehicle load.
A driver may initially find the overall effect of the “car catching up with the engine” unexpected. Another characteristic that initially may seem strange to customers is that pressing the accelerator pedal will increase vehicle speed but won’t necessarily modify the engine sound because the CVT is built to keep the engine running at an ideal speed over a wide range of vehicle speeds.
But after they get used to the CVT, drivers start to appreciate how well it works. Even the little off-the-line lurch that drivers experience and anticipate in a car with a normal automatic transmission is replicated by the Mitsubishi INVECS III software. Without this programming, one would think that the CVT reaction is sluggish.
The optional CVT in the Lancer DE and ES versions has two driving modes, “D” and “L,” which will be familiar to those used to traditional automatics. With a target primary rotation speed set to correspond with vehicle speed and throttle opening in each mode, the CVT ratio is adjusted based on shift patterns. On most roads, the D-range ratio pattern (corresponding to the “Drive” mode in a traditional automatic) is tuned to offer the best mix of dynamic performance and fuel efficiency.
Based on a value that is appropriate for the driving environment, the INVECS III software calculates the excess or deficiency of engine braking from the driver’s brake and accelerator operation and adaptively compensates for it. The driver can choose “L” mode to provide increased engine brakes during deceleration in particularly mountainous locations.
The optional CVT has a Sportronic setting that is only available in the 2008 Lancer GTS and offers quick 6-step manual control using the magnesium steering wheel paddle shifters. A lot of traditional automatic transmissions have manual control to make driving more interesting. Pulley hydraulics in the Sportronic CVT, however, provide quicker and more precise “shifts” than those in traditional automatic transmissions. Though technically Mitsubishi could have chosen any number of “gears,” six was found to be the ideal amount for usability, sporty driving, and adaptability.
Which is preferable, Evo or STI?
The 122 horsepower per liter of the Evo significantly outperforms the 102 horsepower per liter of the STI. But it’s not that easy either, as weight to power is another crucial ratio to look at. The STI outperforms the Evo by at least 1.2 pounds per horsepower, regardless of how the measurement is done (from the crankshaft or the wheels).